![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Re-read The Acts of King Arthur and His Noble Knights by John Steinbeck, which I read a couple of years before I really got onto my Arthuriana kick and have been meaning to re-read since. The first five of the total seven stories/chapters are more or less a straightforward translation of Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur, and I found myself more surprised than I should have been by how much it Smacked Of Gender— all broad sweeping statements about "the inborn craft of maidens" and "inborn helplessness of men" and "the detachment of ladies for other ladies" in the place of any individual characterization for, e.g., Nyneve (Nimue). My Arthurian reading of the past five years has skewed towards women authors and/or recent adaptations with intentionally 21st century attitudes, which might be why this felt so jarring?? On the other hand, this might technically have more women per page than most... what I guess I'd call character-focused(?) retellings, since a knight apparently could not throw a stone in the Arthurian Britain of Malory-by-way-of-Steinbeck without hitting a damsel, often accompanied by several of her friends, who would provide a random quest or otherwise notable encounter; I kept thinking of a post I saw... somewhere... about how often the "damsels in distress" of Arthurian legend show up to demand violence be done on their behalf.
On the third hand, my favorite story/chapter - "Gawain, Ewain, and Marhalt", which as pointed out by Christopher Paolini's foreword is the point where Steinbeck starts to mix things up, inventing scenes and "delv{ing} into the characters' thoughts and feelings in a way Malory never did" - flips the first point delightfully on its head. The titular three knights encounter a trio of ladies, who bestow the quest of each picking a lady to go off and adventure with for one (1) year— impetuous Gawain picks the beautiful fifteen-year-old, who proceeds to complain constantly and then bail on him after a week for another knight since Gawain literally will not shut up about himself; solid Marhalt picks the thirty-year-old veteran adventuress (or "dame errant"), who's so comfortably competent that she feels like a Pratchett heroine; and young Ewain picks the oldest woman, who turns out to be a sort of Arthurian [insert karate movie mentor here], secretly training untested young knights into perfect fighting machines. It's fabulous.
The other stand-out is "The Noble Tale of Sir Lancelot of the Lake", which reminded me a lot of T.H. White, although maybe the comparison is inevitable. (Side note: I feel like positive depictions of Lancelot have kind of fallen out of fashion, retelling-wise?) Steinbeck's Lancelot is ascetic, alternately insightful and bewildered by other people, uncomfortable with the extent of his fame; the doomed Arthur-Guinevere-Lancelot love triangle hangs lightly but inescapably over this story and pays off with one of the most deliciously *drags hands down my face screaming* takes on it I've read.
Also interesting to (re-)discover that I had highlighted a couple of quotes back in 2018:
On the third hand, my favorite story/chapter - "Gawain, Ewain, and Marhalt", which as pointed out by Christopher Paolini's foreword is the point where Steinbeck starts to mix things up, inventing scenes and "delv{ing} into the characters' thoughts and feelings in a way Malory never did" - flips the first point delightfully on its head. The titular three knights encounter a trio of ladies, who bestow the quest of each picking a lady to go off and adventure with for one (1) year— impetuous Gawain picks the beautiful fifteen-year-old, who proceeds to complain constantly and then bail on him after a week for another knight since Gawain literally will not shut up about himself; solid Marhalt picks the thirty-year-old veteran adventuress (or "dame errant"), who's so comfortably competent that she feels like a Pratchett heroine; and young Ewain picks the oldest woman, who turns out to be a sort of Arthurian [insert karate movie mentor here], secretly training untested young knights into perfect fighting machines. It's fabulous.
The other stand-out is "The Noble Tale of Sir Lancelot of the Lake", which reminded me a lot of T.H. White, although maybe the comparison is inevitable. (Side note: I feel like positive depictions of Lancelot have kind of fallen out of fashion, retelling-wise?) Steinbeck's Lancelot is ascetic, alternately insightful and bewildered by other people, uncomfortable with the extent of his fame; the doomed Arthur-Guinevere-Lancelot love triangle hangs lightly but inescapably over this story and pays off with one of the most deliciously *drags hands down my face screaming* takes on it I've read.
Also interesting to (re-)discover that I had highlighted a couple of quotes back in 2018:
In a corner lay the giant’s hoard. Gold and silver, jewels and bright cloth, crucifixes of precious things and chalices set with rubies and emeralds, and along with these colored stones and pieces of broken glass from church windows and quartz and knobby crystal and shards of blue and yellow pottery—a mighty mixture of great wealth and great nonsense. And Sir Marhalt, looking at the heap, said sadly, “Poor thing. He didn’t know the difference. He couldn’t learn to steal only valuable things as civilized men and women do.”
“Then it is better, sir, to love whom one cannot have?”
“Probably better,” Lancelot said. “Certainly safer.”
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 03:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-13 01:48 am (UTC)But the THW Lancelot is such an alltime character, it's hard to imagine a better take so maybe people swerve?
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 11:43 am (UTC)I had never heard of that. Sounds amazing.
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 12:15 pm (UTC)Sounds about right! :o)
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 05:05 pm (UTC)“Poor thing. He didn’t know the difference. He couldn’t learn to steal only valuable things as civilized men and women do.”
Screaming forever.
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 06:08 pm (UTC)That's basically my guess, although I feel like the shift towards retellings that focus on the less "popular" knights has something to do with it— sort of throwing Lancelot (and/or Arthur) under the narrative bus to, idk, justify why Kay (and/or the "second-string" knights who are the focus in Grossman's adaptation) is the main character? Although, side note #1, "The Tale of Sir Lancelot of the Lake" has a great scene with Lancelot and Kay, so it is possible, and side note #2, did you know there's new Cherith Baldry Kay stories???
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 07:02 pm (UTC)WHAT. WHAT. WHAT.
one of the most important but oft misunderstood members of Arthur’s court
The description is just telling you Baldry's interpretation right up front!
I'm so sad it doesn't appear to be available in print, because this is so crying out for another DW mail book club.
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 07:06 pm (UTC)No, it is! It's just listed separately for whatever reason.
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 07:24 pm (UTC)Are we gonna? Are we gonna?
no subject
Date: 2025-03-13 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-13 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-13 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-20 08:55 pm (UTC)Not being a fan of bus-throwing retellings in general, I really appreciate that Phyllis Ann Karr's Lancelot is never seen in-text, which means that while Kay doesn't have one good word to say about him, the reader really cannot take the characterization without several handfuls of salt.
did you know there's new Cherith Baldry Kay stories???
NO. WHAT.
(Thank you for establishing in further comments that you are going to review this book, I look forward, I really wish Karr had collected her Arthurian short fiction back in the day.)
no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-12 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-15 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-15 07:49 pm (UTC)Enjoy!!
no subject
Date: 2025-03-20 08:57 pm (UTC)Confused but sold.
no subject
Date: 2025-03-20 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-03-20 10:38 pm (UTC)I slammed the button to sign your petition so fast.