troisoiseaux: (reading 9)
Finished One Man's Meat by E.B. White, a collection of essays from 1938-1943 that I had originally been drawn to by the humorous tone of the one I encountered in the wild (on spending so much time thinking about all the things you need to do today that suddenly it's 4 pm and you haven't done any of them— a mood!) and turned out to have more heft than I'd expected, emotionally - or philosophically? - speaking. (The period it covers, which I didn't know at that first encounter, would be a clue.) Maybe "heft" isn't quite the right word, either: even at its most serious— which is probably the essay tearing Anne Lindbergh's The Wave of the Future to shreds over her stance of "totalitarianism: just lie down and take it"— his writing has this mix of firm conviction and general bemusement that's like... charming in the way that Columbo is charming...? I don't know; it's a good book and I'm glad I read it.

Read Susan, Linda, Nina & Cokie: The Extraordinary Story of the Founding Mothers of NPR by Lisa Napoli, which is what it says on the tin.

Read River Mumma by Zalika Reid-Benta, a fast-paced urban fantasy rooted in Jamaican folklore and set in Toronto.

Read The Happy Couple by Naoise Dolan, about an angsty millennial couple in Dublin heading towards their ill-advised wedding day. I tried reading this when it came out last year but found the lightly ironic tone too grating to get far— I guess I just had to be (and finally was) in the right mood for it?
troisoiseaux: (eugene de blaas)
Saw Songbird at the Kennedy Center, an adaptation of Offenbach's La Périchole set in Prohibition-era New Orleans— in a pre-show lecture, librettist Kelley Rourke explained how the idea had arisen from the constraints of making a COVID-safe production for an outdoor festival in 2021: it had to be 90 minutes max because they couldn't have an intermission, had to have a relatively small cast for on-stage social distancing, and had to be in English because they couldn't project subtitles (although this last one was more flexible; it ended up being sung in both French and English, with some songs entirely in one or the other and some swapping between the two languages within the same song, even line by line). From "bilingual mini-production of La Périchole" came "what if it was set in New Orleans, which still a bilingual city in the 1920s?" and "you know what context might make the Opera Logic of the plot make sense? Mardi Gras!" and thus, Songbird was born.

Read more... )

The other show I saw somewhat recently was The Lehman Trilogy, at the Shakespeare Theater Company: a three-and-a-half-hour (!) play about the 164-year history of the Lehman Brothers corporation, which actually felt more like a prose poem - or maybe three monologues in a trenchcoat? - than a play, in a way I still can't quite put into words. It's performed by three actors, who practically shapeshift on stage by vibes alone: from the three Lehman brothers who immigrated from Bavaria in the 1840s to open a fabric store in Montgomery, Alabama, to their wives, children, and grandchildren, and anyone else incidental to the story.

Read more... )
troisoiseaux: (reading 8)
Listened to an audiobook of The Last Smile in Sunder City, written and read by Luke Arnold, better known for playing John Silver on Black Sails— which is 100% why I gave this book a shot and was, I will confess, pleasantly surprised to discover that it was actually... good? It's an urban fantasy detective novel set in a once-magical world whose source of magic has disappeared: still populated by elves, ogres, wizards, werewolves, vampires, etc., but now elves/vampires are no longer immortal, wizards can't do magic, werewolves are caught in half-transformation, and some forms of life died out entirely. The world-building was clever, the main character's tragic backstory unfolded in interesting ways, and overall, it ended up being a lot darker than I'd expected, but interestingly so.

I think this worked better for me as an audiobook than if I'd actually read-read it. It turns out that Luke Arnold is great at Doing Voices, and I particularly liked the use of different accents for different species— off the top of my head, American accents for non-magical humans (including first-person POV character Fetch Phillips, a hard-drinking private investigator with a broken heart and a guilty conscience), plummy English accents for wizards, Cockney(?) ogres, a cyclops bartender with a thick Scottish brogue, and a dragonborn/lizardfolk-type detective with a subtly hissing lisp.

Read Slow Horses by Mick Herron, in which an office of disgraced MI5 agents sentenced to desk jobs for various screw-ups finds itself at the center of a conspiracy with geopolitical implications— and at least one life more immediately at stake. Fast-paced and funny! My biggest takeaway is that Herron likes playing with audience expectations, and like, phrasing things to suggest he means one thing and then it turns out to mean something else; I thought this was done cleverly the first time - spoilers ) - but grew slightly wearing once he was pulling a bait-and-switch every other paragraph. (Insert that one Pacific Rim meme here.)
troisoiseaux: (reading 7)
Continued my "nonfiction about spies" kick with Jim Popkin's Code Name Blue Wren, about Ana Belén Montes, an analyst at the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency who was arrested in 2001 for spying for Cuba since the 1980s— while her sister worked on a FBI task force to take down a Cuban spy ring in Miami. A quick, interesting read, although weakest when trying to take a psychological angle; the highlight was all of Popkin's sources from the different agencies involved in the investigation that ultimately caught Montes sniping about each other's versions of the story.

Still reading In the First Circle; just over the 50% mark. The narrative finally looped back around to the plot point introduced in the first chapter— in which a Russian diplomat calls the American embassy to warn them about a spy stealing nuclear secrets, only to be ignored because everyone is busy celebrating Christmas, and a bored young security officer fails to properly trace the call— although soon veered off again to follow the wife of one of the prisoners, a graduate student torn between loyalty to her husband and the risk of getting kicked out of her program if it's discovered that she's married to a convicted "traitor." (This is, so far, a particularly interesting subplot, as a peek into an aspect of Soviet life I haven't read about before: academia.)

I've also been reading One Man's Meat by E.B. White, a collection of essays from the 1930s-40s; I actually started around the same time as [personal profile] osprey_archer, but at my current pace of "pick it up once a week or so," I'm only 40% through. This is super interesting to read after having read Frederick Lewis Allen's Since Yesterday - a 1940 social history of the U.S. in the 1930s - last fall, since there's a fair amount of topical overlap, from a different perspective: where Allen mentions the 1939 World's Fair in New York as a sort of thematic bookend to his narrative of the 1930s, or discusses Francis Townsend and his proposal for a national pension plan as a social movement in response to the Depression, White writes with tongue firmly in cheek about his own visit to the World's Fair, or with a diarist's eye rather than a historian's about going to hear Townsend proselytize about his pension plan.
troisoiseaux: (reading 4)
Finished Ben Macintyre's A Spy Among Friends: Kim Philby and the Great Betrayal and just... WOW. Honestly, the wildly incompetent intelligence agency of John le Carré's The Looking Glass War makes a lot more sense now.

Read more... )
troisoiseaux: (reading 6)
Read Agent Josephine by Damien Lewis, about Josephine Baker's work for France's Deuxième Bureau and Britain's Secret Intelligence Service (and the Free French) in, respectively, the years leading up to and during WWII: her superstardom was the perfect cover to gather information by mingling with people in high places, and to smuggle information to the British across international borders (in invisible ink on her music sheets or notes pinned to her underclothes!) because who would suspect/demand to search a globally famous performer swanning through checkpoints with a menagerie of exotic pets in tow?! This book was also more broadly about Allied intelligence and alliance-building efforts in North Africa ahead of 1942's Operation Torch (including recruiting and supplying smugglers to engage in intelligence-gathering and arms- and agent-running under the cover of "genuine" smuggling); Baker herself spent much of 1941-42 in a Casablanca hospital, battling peritonitis, but her private hospital room was a key rendezvous point for Allied agents.

Keeping to the theme, I'm reading Ben Macintyre's A Spy Among Friends, about Kim Philby of the infamous "Cambridge Five" Soviet spy ring within the British intelligence services— although I've just read about how, ironically, early in Philby's career as a double agent, the Soviets were deeply suspicious of him, because 1. how did a self-professed communist get a job at MI6 so easily??? (answer: the vetting process was basically just some guy going "yeah, he's fine, I went to Eton with his dad") and 2. the information he was passing along didn't support their preconceived notions. (When tasked with informing the NKVD of the identities of all British spies in the Soviet Union, he came back with the - true! - answer that, actually, there weren't any, and also they were only #10 on Britain's list of intelligence priorities given, you know, WWII; the Soviet response was WELL, OBVIOUSLY HE'S LYING.) It's bypassed irony and landed on comedy of errors: "Philby was telling Moscow the truth and was disbelieved but allowed to go on thinking he was believed; he was deceiving the British in order to aid the Soviets, who suspected a deception and were in turn deceiving him."
troisoiseaux: (reading 5)
I recently hit a bit of a book slump, so I ended up reading a couple of plays instead: Osamu Dazai's A New Hamlet (1941) and Thornton Wilder's Our Town (1938). (Although, technically, I think A New Hamlet is a novel written in the form of a script...? But if it waddles and quacks, at what point is it no longer a duck?)

A New Hamlet was... interesting? It is, as the title suggests, an adaptation of Hamlet, although "remix" might be a more apt description. The first couple of scenes are more or less a direct "modern" translation of Hamlet's Act I, Scene 2 and 3— I pulled up the original online, for a line-by-line comparison— although, actually, it's twice translated: from its original Shakespearean English to mid-20th century Japanese, and then from Japanese to English circa the 2010s. (Owen Cooney's translation is an interesting blend of sounding natural as contemporary English, having a certain cadence(?) where it's more obvious that it was translated from a different language, and - mostly in Ophelia's case - intentionally anachronistic, even Shakespearean, phrasing.)

After that, the plot is different. )

Our Town is technically a re-read; I'd studied it in 9th grade English, but to be honest, it hadn't left a particularly strong impression on me at the time.* What made it interesting, this time, was that the edition I borrowed had a bunch of "bonus content" about the play's history, inspirations (surprisingly, classical Greek and Chinese theater?), and Wilder's writing process, including changes that were made between drafts— e.g., in an early draft, young George Gibbs had political ambitions, but this was cut for not being in line with Wilder's goal of "an allegorical representation of all life." There was also apparently some behind-the-scenes drama between Wilder and Our Town's original director, Jed Harris; a list of changes Wilder demanded to Harris' direction boiled down to "stop changing the lines" and "everyone's acting should be like 60% less weepily sentimental."

Footnote )
troisoiseaux: (colette)
Monet Refuses the Operation
by Lisel Mueller [x]

Doctor, you say that there are no halos
around the streetlights in Paris
and what I see is an aberration
caused by old age, an affliction.
I tell you it has taken me all my life
to arrive at the vision of gas lamps as angels,
to soften and blur and finally banish
the edges you regret I don't see,
to learn that the line I called the horizon
does not exist and sky and water,
so long apart, are the same state of being.
Fifty-four years before I could see
Rouen cathedral is built
of parallel shafts of sun,
and now you want to restore
my youthful errors: fixed
notions of top and bottom,
the illusion of three-dimensional space,
wisteria separate
from the bridge it covers.
What can I say to convince you
the Houses of Parliament dissolve
night after night to become
the fluid dream of the Thames?
I will not return to a universe
of objects that don't know each other,
as if islands were not the lost children
of one great continent. The world
is flux, and light becomes what it touches,
becomes water, lilies on water,
above and below water,
becomes lilac and mauve and yellow
and white and cerulean lamps,
small fists passing sunlight
so quickly to one another
that it would take long, streaming hair
inside my brush to catch it.
To paint the speed of light!
Our weighted shapes, these verticals,
burn to mix with air
and changes our bones, skin, clothes
to gases. Doctor,
if only you could see
how heaven pulls earth into its arms
and how infinitely the heart expands
to claim this world, blue vapor without end.
troisoiseaux: (reading 4)
Read 8 Lives of a Century-Old Trickster by Mirinae Lee, a novel in interconnected short stories. When a nursing home employee who helps residents write their own obituaries asks her usual prompt - "Which three words would you use to sum up your life?" - one elderly woman, a North Korean defector, replies with seven: "Slave. Escape-artist. Murderer. Terrorist. Spy. Lover. And mother." The seven* short stories that follow trace a life lived under many names— the name forced on her as a victim of sexual trafficking by the Japanese army during WWII; the name she stole, when she returned to Pyongyang, to slip into the life left behind by a friend who didn't make it out of their shared ordeal; the name she gave when she turned herself in as a spy and took when she started a new life in South Korea— amidst the turbulence of 20th century Korean history.

I haven't mentioned it for fear of jinxing myself,** but I've been making slowish but steady progress through Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's In The First Circle since mid-December; I'm 30% through. Set in 1949, mostly in a sharashka— a Soviet prison camp for academics, engineers, etc., where the prisoners' forced labor is engaged in scientific research and development— outside of Moscow, it's (so far) more atmospheric and philosophical than plot-heavy, each chapter dwelling on the POV of different characters: the sharashka's prisoners and guards; high-level Soviet officials— including, in a couple of bitingly ironic chapters, Stalin— and low-level bureaucratic cogs. It's compelling stuff! It is a bit of a struggle to keep all of the characters straight— both due to quantity, and because there are a lot of similar-looking names— but so far this hasn't caused any actual problems.

Footnotes )
troisoiseaux: (reading 3)
Read The Future by Catherine Leroux, set in a dystopian future(?) Detroit with an alternate-history past – in this world, it's the francophone Canadian city of Fort Détroit – and also magic?? (It took me until almost the end of the book to pin down whether the magic was actually happening or more metaphorical magical realism, but I came down on the side of there being actual magic.) All of which is just the backdrop! Plot-wise, it's about a woman searching for her missing granddaughters after their mother/her daughter is murdered, which brings her into the orbit of two communities: a ramshackle society of lost children living in Fort Détroit's Parc Rouge, and a neighborhood bound by shared history and a shared garden. It's a kaleidoscopic story, with a wide-reaching narrative built from vignettes, each tightly focused on one or two individual characters; and it's a story that loops around on itself, revisiting the same scenes from different perspectives. My interest in this had originally been piqued by Leroux's alt-history Detroit, but I ended up really liking it for the ways it felt like a take on Peter Pan.

Read Deep Secret by Diana Wynne Jones, which was an ABSOLUTE DELIGHT, 10/10. If you've ever read Howl's Moving Castle and been like "I wish DWJ had written a prequel about how a Welsh grad student ends up as a wizard in another world," this is not exactly that book, but it satisfies the same itch: a stressed-out multiverse wizard in his mid-20s tries to keep a space empire from collapsing while also looking for a new multiverse wizard apprentice at a sci-fi/fantasy convention in England, and he is so annoyed about the bossy weird young woman who is obviously his best choice. I loved this!! It has so many great characters, and does fun things with blending magic and (1990s) technology, and made me nostalgic for a convention experience I've never actually had. It definitely felt written for a more mature audience than most of DWJ's books, both in a "jokes about erotic art and orgies" way and a "higher stakes, more serious consequences" way...? Very '90s in some ways that have not aged super well, but didn't rankle.
troisoiseaux: (colette)
I started watching Reign of Terror on the strength of this Tumblr post - describing it as, among other things, "the plot is that Robespierre's Death Note has gone missing" - before realizing, ten minutes in, that [personal profile] sovay had recommended this movie a couple of years ago under its alternate title, The Black Book. (Honestly, I should have made the connection just from the descriptions of this movie's Saint-Just as, respectively, "nightmarishly butch" and "unusually heterosexual.")

Whatever its title, it's a wildly historically inaccurate reimagining of the 48 hours leading up to the coup d'état of 9 Thermidor as a beat-perfect spy noir, complete with a secret agent for its hero and a femme fatale and sadistic villains galore. (Arnold Moss as Fouché— head of Robespierre's secret police, champion lurker and deliverer of darkly funny quips, and an agenda unto himself— is absolutely the highlight of the movie.) Every single actor has the most American accent I've ever heard. I have no idea how it works but it does; pretty much every individual aspect of the film is objectively bonkers, but the sum of its parts is unironically the best time I've had watching a movie in ages.
troisoiseaux: (reading 2)
Read Going Infinite by Michael Lewis, about Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX infamy, which - as an avid reader of chronicles of the collapse and/or dysfunctional inner workings of massively overvalued startups with unscrupulous founders (e.g., Theranos, WeWork, Uber) - struck me as surprisingly... sympathetic? credulous? defensive? Lewis' view of Bankman-Fried and the nuclear meltdown of his ostensibly multibillion-dollar cryptocurrency exchange is that it was all incompetence, rather than malice, but I am not entirely sure that "eccentric wunderkind accidentally misplaced several billion dollars of his company's (and clients') money because he just did whatever he wanted all of the time and left other people to handle the logistics" is really that much more defensible than a calculated scam/theft?? Even if best taken with several shovels of salt, this was an entertaining read. I didn't need or particularly want to know how much of Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison's romantic communication was written in business memo-style bullet points, but I've enjoyed imposing this knowledge on others.

Read People Collide by Isle McElroy: an American couple living in Bulgaria wakes up one morning to find themselves in a Freaky Friday-like bodyswap situation; or rather, a struggling writer wakes up to discover that he is in his wife's body and his wife - who is presumably in his - has disappeared. This book feels like the middle of a Venn diagram between Andrea Lawlor's Paul Takes The Form of a Mortal Girl and Aimee Pokwatka's Self-Portrait With Nothing, which is kind of wild, actually— to have recently stumbled across three different books that seem to form a kind of conceptual/thematic spectrum, without reflecting a definable trend...?
troisoiseaux: (reading 1)
Read I Have Some Questions For You by Rebecca Makkai: I had thought I knew what to expect from this novel, with its premise of "podcaster returns to teach at the New England boarding school where her classmate was murdered during their senior year," but it surprised me by being much more complicated and interesting than I'd expected. I liked the narrative devices it used— addressing the first-person narration to a "you" whose identity and role in the story becomes gradually clear; the running thread, in the background, of an ongoing #MeToo-era news story that is never identified specifically, or rather, is identified as all of the news stories— and I liked the overall plot, which was more of a "coming to terms with one's coming-of-age, decades later" story than a campus murder mystery. (Although the campus murder mystery is there, too.)

Read Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow by Gabrielle Zevin, which also was not what I expected, although in this case it's not my own snobbery to blame, but the fact that the friend who recommended this to me did not follow up her "it's great!" with, say, "but devastating!" and I was therefore completely blindsided by the third-act MAJOR SPOILER. ) It is a good book, though: both a compelling read and a well-constructed one.
troisoiseaux: (reading 11)
Read two books that struck me in similar ways, for different reasons: Paul Takes The Form of a Mortal Girl by Andrea Lawlor (gender-bending shape-shifter travels across the U.S., from queer scene to queer scene, in the early '90s) and Self-Portrait With Nothing by Aimee Pokwatka (eccentric artist rumored to access alternate universes through her paintings goes missing; her long-lost daughter tries to find her). The only obvious similarity between the two is the way the setting is mostly realistic, with one fantastical element; in maybe more of a stretch, both books use a narrative device of... talking about something that wasn't "really" happening to make sense of something that was...? Like, in Paul, the main plot is woven through with fairy tale retellings that provide a sort of insight-by-metaphor into the titular Paul, and in Self-Portrait, the long-lost daughter copes with situations she doesn't want to be in by imagining what she'd be doing instead, in different universes. (For that matter, both books reminded me of other books: I found Paul reminiscent of Katya Kazbek's Little Foxes Took Up Matches, in the way that both use fairy/folk tales to frame a queer coming-of-age story, and Self-Portrait turned out to share a major plot point/concept with, of all things, Maggie Stiefvater's Call Down the Hawk.)

Read Trust by Hernan Diaz, a novel made up of four variations on the same story: a 1930s novel about a preternaturally successful financier and his wife; a half-finished memoir by the "real" financier, intended to refute the fictionalization of his life in the novel-within-a-novel; the late-in-life memoir of the ghostwriter behind the financier's memoir, the daughter of an Italian anarchist; and the diary the financier's wife kept in her last months. The financier's wife is the point of greatest difference between all four sections— she's painted as a tragic figure by the novelist and as a childlike saint by her husband; the ghostwriter grapples with this dissonance and fills the gaps with her own self-identification; and finally, her journal turns everything from the proceeding sections on its head.
troisoiseaux: (Default)
Winter Solstice, Camelot Station
by John M. Ford [x]

Camelot is served
By a sixteen-track stub terminal done in High Gothick Style,
The tracks covered by a single great barrel-vaulted glass roof framed upon iron,
At once looking back to the Romans and ahead to the Brunels.
Beneath its rotunda, just to the left of the ticket windows,
Is a mosaic floor depicting the Round Table
(Where all knights, regardless of their station of origin
Or class of accommodation, are equal),
And around it murals of knightly deeds in action
(Slaying dragons, righting wrongs, rescuing maidens tied to the tracks).
It is the only terminal, other than Gare d'Avalon in Paris,
To be hung with original tapestries,
And its lavatories rival those at the Great Gate of Kiev Central.
During a peak season such as this, some eighty trains a day pass through,
Five times the frequency at the old Londinium Terminus,
Ten times the number the Druid towermen knew.
(The Official Court Christmas Card this year displays
A crisp black-and-white Charles Clegg photograph from the King's own collection.
Showing a woad-blued hogger at the throttle of "Old XCVII,"
The Fast Mail overnight to Eboracum. Those were the days.)
The first of a line of wagons have arrived,
Spilling footmen and pages in Court livery,
And old thick Kay, stepping down from his Range Rover,
Tricked out in a bush coat from Swaine, Adeney, Brigg,
Leaning on his shooting stick as he marshalls his company,
Instructing the youngest how to behave in the station,
To help mature women that they may encounter,
Report pickpockets, gather up litter,
And of course no true Knight of the Table Round (even in training)
Would do a station porter out of Christmas tips.
He checks his list of arrival times, then his watch
(A moon-phase Breguet, gift from Merlin):
The seneschal is a practical man, who knows trains do run late,
And a stolid one, who sees no reason to be glad about it.
He dispatches pages to posts at the tracks,
Doling out pennies for platform tickets,
Then walks past the station buffet with a dyspeptic snort,
Goes into the bar, checks the time again, orders a pint.
The patrons half turn—it's the fella from Camelot, innit?
And Kay chuckles soft to himself, and the Court buys a round.
He's barely halfway when a page tumbles in,
Seems the knights are arriving, on time after all,
So he tips the glass back (people stare as he guzzles),
Then plonks it down hard with five quid for the barman,
And strides for the doorway (half Falstaff, half Hotspur)
To summon his liveried army of lads.

* * *

this is a long poem )
troisoiseaux: (reading 10)
Read The Bandit Queens by Parini Shroff: "a young Indian woman finds the false rumors that she killed her husband surprisingly useful— until other women in the village start asking for her help getting rid of their own husbands." Very fun read! It's a dark comedy that touches on serious themes— abusive relationships, sexual assault, sexism, caste and religious prejudice— but frequently made me laugh out loud.

Read The Bookseller of Inverness by S.G. MacLean, a historical mystery/thriller set in the Scottish Highlands. A disillusioned veteran of the 1745 Jacobite rebellion turned curmudgeonly bookseller finds a murdered stranger inside his shop, with a white cockade tied to the knife that killed him, on the same day that his fugitive father— a veteran of '15 and '45, and a spy for King James— returns to Inverness, drawing him into a tangled web of old betrayals and new conspiracies.
troisoiseaux: (reading 9)
Read a couple of contemporary slice-of-life novels: Nevada by Imogen Binnie, about a trans woman who goes on a post-break-up road trip and befriends a small-town stoner who reminds her of her younger self, and in a now-annual re-read, The Sentence by Louise Erdrich, about an Ojibwe bookseller haunted by the ghost of a persistent former customer during the early months of the pandemic.

Read Thinning Blood by Leah Myers, a memoir about her identity as the last person in her family line eligible to be an enrolled member of the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe and the women she's descended from. Shuffles myth, history, family stories, and personal experience like a deck of cards and deals them out in little vignettes.

Read The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes by Suzanne Collins, a prequel to her Hunger Games trilogy; it was actually really good?? Or at least really compelling. It felt darker than the original books, not least because it's a dystopian novel whose POV character— a young Coriolanus Snow, future dictator and main villain of the Hunger Games books— has fully bought into the ideology of the dystopia he lives in; ... )

Read The Fabulist: The Lying, Hustling, Grifting, Stealing, and Very American Legend of George Santos by Mark Chiusano, which is what it says on the tin. I have a certain fascination with audacious public liars— like Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos infamy, or the bizarre spate of white academics pretending to be people of color a while back— so of course I've been following every bonkers twist of the George Santos saga over the past two-ish years.

I'm currently reading Yellowface by R.F. Kuang, which fits in rather neatly with the above; the concept is basically Jean Hanff Korelitz's The Plot (struggling writer steals a book idea/unfinished draft from a deceased student/frenemy and passes it off as their own work) with more satire about cultural appropriation and the publishing industry.
troisoiseaux: (reading 8)
Read The Sewing Girl's Tale: A Story of Crime and Consequences in Revolutionary America by John Wood Sweet, about the first publicized rape trial in American history, in New York City in 1793, when 17-year-old seamstress Lanah Sawyer pressed charges against the wealthy man who had sexually assaulted her. Three guesses for how this trial played out, and the first two don't count.

Read more... )

Read To Love and Be Wise by Josephine Tey— I actually guessed the twist before opening the book, because I made a connection between the plot summary, having once read that SPOILER REDACTED ) comes up in one of Tey's novels, and also, well, the fact that it was recommended to me; I ended up reading the last chapter first to confirm my theory. This would have been a fun read even if I had taken a more orthodox approach— in some ways, it feels like a successful execution of what Sayers was aiming for in The Five Red Herrings, as a mystery set in a village overrun by eccentric artists and hinging, in part, on an object that isn't there— but I'm actually glad I read it fully spoiled, which is another data point for my musings on when I like being "in the know" vs. letting a mystery unfold as intended: ... )
troisoiseaux: (reading 7)
Read The Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey, a 1951 mystery novel about a detective who delves into the 15th-century case of the princes in the tower while bed-bound with a broken leg and bored out of his mind. Super interesting book, possibly not for the reasons Tey intended. Her detective's conclusion ) is probably best taken with several shakers of salt, but overall, it's quite fascinating as a contemplation of how history gets written and taught and interpreted, and inadvertently meta as said contemplation is filtered through a very specific perspective ("reflect[ing] a dislike and distrust of emotional popular narratives concerning supposed historical injustices," per Wikipedia). It's also interesting, having finally read another Josephine Tey book besides Miss Pym Disposes, to compare the way that assumptions based on appearances play out in both books: ... )

Read Mr. Rowl by D.K. Broster, a 1924 historical romance set during the Napoleonic Wars. The plot is delightfully bananas, just an absolute roller coaster of one dramatic misunderstanding after another:

In which I basically just recount the entire plot of Mr. Rowl )
troisoiseaux: (reading 6)
Read The Looking Glass War by John le Carré, about a deeply incompetent intelligence agency— not the Circus, of le Carré's other novels (although it, and George Smiley, plays a role in this one) but the remains of a WWII-era military intelligence agency, the Department, long since stripped for its useable parts and desperate to keep up appearances— whose collective mid-life crisis has a body count when they recruit a long-retired operative for one last mission in East Germany.

Read The Last Kingdom by Bernard Cornwell, the first book in a sprawling historical fiction series about a Saxon-born, Viking-raised warrior in 9th century Britain. I enjoyed reading this but don't feel particularly inclined to continue the series.

Read Prophet by Sin Blaché and Helen Macdonald— I've seen people on DW enthusing over this book for months, and it completely lived up to the hype, especially since I somehow managed to go in entirely unspoiled! My impression of the plot, going in, was "manic Brit and stoic American investigate supernatural phenomena," which I think both is and is not an accurate summary; the authors have described it as "a mystery, a sci-fi adventure, a spy thriller, a queer romance, a military horror story, and satire about the weaponisation of nostalgia in our present cultural moment" and, yep, it is all of those things.

Read A Rome of One's Own: The Forgotten Women of the Roman Empire by Emma Southon, which had kind of a weak start— the first third or so basically just recounted stories from Livy and Ovid in a "gossipy podcaster" voice— but I'm glad I didn't give up, because it was worth the read once it got to the stories of Roman women that we know about through, e.g., archeological sources rather than Roman historians, like Pompeiian businesswoman Julia Felix or the woman known as Turia whose life story was recorded on a now-fragmented gravestone, or even through their own writings, like the personal correspondence between two military wives in Roman Britain, Sulpicia Lepidina and Claudia Severa, found among the Vindolanda tablets, and the graffiti left by Hadrian's court poet Julia Balbilla on the Colossi of Memnon.
Page generated Mar. 25th, 2024 04:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios