troisoiseaux: (reading 9)
Finished One Man's Meat by E.B. White, a collection of essays from 1938-1943 that I had originally been drawn to by the humorous tone of the one I encountered in the wild (on spending so much time thinking about all the things you need to do today that suddenly it's 4 pm and you haven't done any of them— a mood!) and turned out to have more heft than I'd expected, emotionally - or philosophically? - speaking. (The period it covers, which I didn't know at that first encounter, would be a clue.) Maybe "heft" isn't quite the right word, either: even at its most serious— which is probably the essay tearing Anne Lindbergh's The Wave of the Future to shreds over her stance of "totalitarianism: just lie down and take it"— his writing has this mix of firm conviction and general bemusement that's like... charming in the way that Columbo is charming...? I don't know; it's a good book and I'm glad I read it.

Read Susan, Linda, Nina & Cokie: The Extraordinary Story of the Founding Mothers of NPR by Lisa Napoli, which is what it says on the tin.

Read River Mumma by Zalika Reid-Benta, a fast-paced urban fantasy rooted in Jamaican folklore and set in Toronto.

Read The Happy Couple by Naoise Dolan, about an angsty millennial couple in Dublin heading towards their ill-advised wedding day. I tried reading this when it came out last year but found the lightly ironic tone too grating to get far— I guess I just had to be (and finally was) in the right mood for it?
troisoiseaux: (reading 8)
Listened to an audiobook of The Last Smile in Sunder City, written and read by Luke Arnold, better known for playing John Silver on Black Sails— which is 100% why I gave this book a shot and was, I will confess, pleasantly surprised to discover that it was actually... good? It's an urban fantasy detective novel set in a once-magical world whose source of magic has disappeared: still populated by elves, ogres, wizards, werewolves, vampires, etc., but now elves/vampires are no longer immortal, wizards can't do magic, werewolves are caught in half-transformation, and some forms of life died out entirely. The world-building was clever, the main character's tragic backstory unfolded in interesting ways, and overall, it ended up being a lot darker than I'd expected, but interestingly so.

I think this worked better for me as an audiobook than if I'd actually read-read it. It turns out that Luke Arnold is great at Doing Voices, and I particularly liked the use of different accents for different species— off the top of my head, American accents for non-magical humans (including first-person POV character Fetch Phillips, a hard-drinking private investigator with a broken heart and a guilty conscience), plummy English accents for wizards, Cockney(?) ogres, a cyclops bartender with a thick Scottish brogue, and a dragonborn/lizardfolk-type detective with a subtly hissing lisp.

Read Slow Horses by Mick Herron, in which an office of disgraced MI5 agents sentenced to desk jobs for various screw-ups finds itself at the center of a conspiracy with geopolitical implications— and at least one life more immediately at stake. Fast-paced and funny! My biggest takeaway is that Herron likes playing with audience expectations, and like, phrasing things to suggest he means one thing and then it turns out to mean something else; I thought this was done cleverly the first time - spoilers ) - but grew slightly wearing once he was pulling a bait-and-switch every other paragraph. (Insert that one Pacific Rim meme here.)
troisoiseaux: (reading 7)
Continued my "nonfiction about spies" kick with Jim Popkin's Code Name Blue Wren, about Ana Belén Montes, an analyst at the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency who was arrested in 2001 for spying for Cuba since the 1980s— while her sister worked on a FBI task force to take down a Cuban spy ring in Miami. A quick, interesting read, although weakest when trying to take a psychological angle; the highlight was all of Popkin's sources from the different agencies involved in the investigation that ultimately caught Montes sniping about each other's versions of the story.

Still reading In the First Circle; just over the 50% mark. The narrative finally looped back around to the plot point introduced in the first chapter— in which a Russian diplomat calls the American embassy to warn them about a spy stealing nuclear secrets, only to be ignored because everyone is busy celebrating Christmas, and a bored young security officer fails to properly trace the call— although soon veered off again to follow the wife of one of the prisoners, a graduate student torn between loyalty to her husband and the risk of getting kicked out of her program if it's discovered that she's married to a convicted "traitor." (This is, so far, a particularly interesting subplot, as a peek into an aspect of Soviet life I haven't read about before: academia.)

I've also been reading One Man's Meat by E.B. White, a collection of essays from the 1930s-40s; I actually started around the same time as [personal profile] osprey_archer, but at my current pace of "pick it up once a week or so," I'm only 40% through. This is super interesting to read after having read Frederick Lewis Allen's Since Yesterday - a 1940 social history of the U.S. in the 1930s - last fall, since there's a fair amount of topical overlap, from a different perspective: where Allen mentions the 1939 World's Fair in New York as a sort of thematic bookend to his narrative of the 1930s, or discusses Francis Townsend and his proposal for a national pension plan as a social movement in response to the Depression, White writes with tongue firmly in cheek about his own visit to the World's Fair, or with a diarist's eye rather than a historian's about going to hear Townsend proselytize about his pension plan.
troisoiseaux: (reading 4)
Finished Ben Macintyre's A Spy Among Friends: Kim Philby and the Great Betrayal and just... WOW. Honestly, the wildly incompetent intelligence agency of John le Carré's The Looking Glass War makes a lot more sense now.

Read more... )
troisoiseaux: (reading 6)
Read Agent Josephine by Damien Lewis, about Josephine Baker's work for France's Deuxième Bureau and Britain's Secret Intelligence Service (and the Free French) in, respectively, the years leading up to and during WWII: her superstardom was the perfect cover to gather information by mingling with people in high places, and to smuggle information to the British across international borders (in invisible ink on her music sheets or notes pinned to her underclothes!) because who would suspect/demand to search a globally famous performer swanning through checkpoints with a menagerie of exotic pets in tow?! This book was also more broadly about Allied intelligence and alliance-building efforts in North Africa ahead of 1942's Operation Torch (including recruiting and supplying smugglers to engage in intelligence-gathering and arms- and agent-running under the cover of "genuine" smuggling); Baker herself spent much of 1941-42 in a Casablanca hospital, battling peritonitis, but her private hospital room was a key rendezvous point for Allied agents.

Keeping to the theme, I'm reading Ben Macintyre's A Spy Among Friends, about Kim Philby of the infamous "Cambridge Five" Soviet spy ring within the British intelligence services— although I've just read about how, ironically, early in Philby's career as a double agent, the Soviets were deeply suspicious of him, because 1. how did a self-professed communist get a job at MI6 so easily??? (answer: the vetting process was basically just some guy going "yeah, he's fine, I went to Eton with his dad") and 2. the information he was passing along didn't support their preconceived notions. (When tasked with informing the NKVD of the identities of all British spies in the Soviet Union, he came back with the - true! - answer that, actually, there weren't any, and also they were only #10 on Britain's list of intelligence priorities given, you know, WWII; the Soviet response was WELL, OBVIOUSLY HE'S LYING.) It's bypassed irony and landed on comedy of errors: "Philby was telling Moscow the truth and was disbelieved but allowed to go on thinking he was believed; he was deceiving the British in order to aid the Soviets, who suspected a deception and were in turn deceiving him."
troisoiseaux: (reading 5)
I recently hit a bit of a book slump, so I ended up reading a couple of plays instead: Osamu Dazai's A New Hamlet (1941) and Thornton Wilder's Our Town (1938). (Although, technically, I think A New Hamlet is a novel written in the form of a script...? But if it waddles and quacks, at what point is it no longer a duck?)

A New Hamlet was... interesting? It is, as the title suggests, an adaptation of Hamlet, although "remix" might be a more apt description. The first couple of scenes are more or less a direct "modern" translation of Hamlet's Act I, Scene 2 and 3— I pulled up the original online, for a line-by-line comparison— although, actually, it's twice translated: from its original Shakespearean English to mid-20th century Japanese, and then from Japanese to English circa the 2010s. (Owen Cooney's translation is an interesting blend of sounding natural as contemporary English, having a certain cadence(?) where it's more obvious that it was translated from a different language, and - mostly in Ophelia's case - intentionally anachronistic, even Shakespearean, phrasing.)

After that, the plot is different. )

Our Town is technically a re-read; I'd studied it in 9th grade English, but to be honest, it hadn't left a particularly strong impression on me at the time.* What made it interesting, this time, was that the edition I borrowed had a bunch of "bonus content" about the play's history, inspirations (surprisingly, classical Greek and Chinese theater?), and Wilder's writing process, including changes that were made between drafts— e.g., in an early draft, young George Gibbs had political ambitions, but this was cut for not being in line with Wilder's goal of "an allegorical representation of all life." There was also apparently some behind-the-scenes drama between Wilder and Our Town's original director, Jed Harris; a list of changes Wilder demanded to Harris' direction boiled down to "stop changing the lines" and "everyone's acting should be like 60% less weepily sentimental."

Footnote )
troisoiseaux: (reading 4)
Read 8 Lives of a Century-Old Trickster by Mirinae Lee, a novel in interconnected short stories. When a nursing home employee who helps residents write their own obituaries asks her usual prompt - "Which three words would you use to sum up your life?" - one elderly woman, a North Korean defector, replies with seven: "Slave. Escape-artist. Murderer. Terrorist. Spy. Lover. And mother." The seven* short stories that follow trace a life lived under many names— the name forced on her as a victim of sexual trafficking by the Japanese army during WWII; the name she stole, when she returned to Pyongyang, to slip into the life left behind by a friend who didn't make it out of their shared ordeal; the name she gave when she turned herself in as a spy and took when she started a new life in South Korea— amidst the turbulence of 20th century Korean history.

I haven't mentioned it for fear of jinxing myself,** but I've been making slowish but steady progress through Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's In The First Circle since mid-December; I'm 30% through. Set in 1949, mostly in a sharashka— a Soviet prison camp for academics, engineers, etc., where the prisoners' forced labor is engaged in scientific research and development— outside of Moscow, it's (so far) more atmospheric and philosophical than plot-heavy, each chapter dwelling on the POV of different characters: the sharashka's prisoners and guards; high-level Soviet officials— including, in a couple of bitingly ironic chapters, Stalin— and low-level bureaucratic cogs. It's compelling stuff! It is a bit of a struggle to keep all of the characters straight— both due to quantity, and because there are a lot of similar-looking names— but so far this hasn't caused any actual problems.

Footnotes )
troisoiseaux: (reading 3)
Read The Future by Catherine Leroux, set in a dystopian future(?) Detroit with an alternate-history past – in this world, it's the francophone Canadian city of Fort Détroit – and also magic?? (It took me until almost the end of the book to pin down whether the magic was actually happening or more metaphorical magical realism, but I came down on the side of there being actual magic.) All of which is just the backdrop! Plot-wise, it's about a woman searching for her missing granddaughters after their mother/her daughter is murdered, which brings her into the orbit of two communities: a ramshackle society of lost children living in Fort Détroit's Parc Rouge, and a neighborhood bound by shared history and a shared garden. It's a kaleidoscopic story, with a wide-reaching narrative built from vignettes, each tightly focused on one or two individual characters; and it's a story that loops around on itself, revisiting the same scenes from different perspectives. My interest in this had originally been piqued by Leroux's alt-history Detroit, but I ended up really liking it for the ways it felt like a take on Peter Pan.

Read Deep Secret by Diana Wynne Jones, which was an ABSOLUTE DELIGHT, 10/10. If you've ever read Howl's Moving Castle and been like "I wish DWJ had written a prequel about how a Welsh grad student ends up as a wizard in another world," this is not exactly that book, but it satisfies the same itch: a stressed-out multiverse wizard in his mid-20s tries to keep a space empire from collapsing while also looking for a new multiverse wizard apprentice at a sci-fi/fantasy convention in England, and he is so annoyed about the bossy weird young woman who is obviously his best choice. I loved this!! It has so many great characters, and does fun things with blending magic and (1990s) technology, and made me nostalgic for a convention experience I've never actually had. It definitely felt written for a more mature audience than most of DWJ's books, both in a "jokes about erotic art and orgies" way and a "higher stakes, more serious consequences" way...? Very '90s in some ways that have not aged super well, but didn't rankle.
troisoiseaux: (reading 2)
Read Going Infinite by Michael Lewis, about Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX infamy, which - as an avid reader of chronicles of the collapse and/or dysfunctional inner workings of massively overvalued startups with unscrupulous founders (e.g., Theranos, WeWork, Uber) - struck me as surprisingly... sympathetic? credulous? defensive? Lewis' view of Bankman-Fried and the nuclear meltdown of his ostensibly multibillion-dollar cryptocurrency exchange is that it was all incompetence, rather than malice, but I am not entirely sure that "eccentric wunderkind accidentally misplaced several billion dollars of his company's (and clients') money because he just did whatever he wanted all of the time and left other people to handle the logistics" is really that much more defensible than a calculated scam/theft?? Even if best taken with several shovels of salt, this was an entertaining read. I didn't need or particularly want to know how much of Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison's romantic communication was written in business memo-style bullet points, but I've enjoyed imposing this knowledge on others.

Read People Collide by Isle McElroy: an American couple living in Bulgaria wakes up one morning to find themselves in a Freaky Friday-like bodyswap situation; or rather, a struggling writer wakes up to discover that he is in his wife's body and his wife - who is presumably in his - has disappeared. This book feels like the middle of a Venn diagram between Andrea Lawlor's Paul Takes The Form of a Mortal Girl and Aimee Pokwatka's Self-Portrait With Nothing, which is kind of wild, actually— to have recently stumbled across three different books that seem to form a kind of conceptual/thematic spectrum, without reflecting a definable trend...?
troisoiseaux: (reading 1)
Read I Have Some Questions For You by Rebecca Makkai: I had thought I knew what to expect from this novel, with its premise of "podcaster returns to teach at the New England boarding school where her classmate was murdered during their senior year," but it surprised me by being much more complicated and interesting than I'd expected. I liked the narrative devices it used— addressing the first-person narration to a "you" whose identity and role in the story becomes gradually clear; the running thread, in the background, of an ongoing #MeToo-era news story that is never identified specifically, or rather, is identified as all of the news stories— and I liked the overall plot, which was more of a "coming to terms with one's coming-of-age, decades later" story than a campus murder mystery. (Although the campus murder mystery is there, too.)

Read Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow by Gabrielle Zevin, which also was not what I expected, although in this case it's not my own snobbery to blame, but the fact that the friend who recommended this to me did not follow up her "it's great!" with, say, "but devastating!" and I was therefore completely blindsided by the third-act MAJOR SPOILER. ) It is a good book, though: both a compelling read and a well-constructed one.
troisoiseaux: (reading 11)
Read two books that struck me in similar ways, for different reasons: Paul Takes The Form of a Mortal Girl by Andrea Lawlor (gender-bending shape-shifter travels across the U.S., from queer scene to queer scene, in the early '90s) and Self-Portrait With Nothing by Aimee Pokwatka (eccentric artist rumored to access alternate universes through her paintings goes missing; her long-lost daughter tries to find her). The only obvious similarity between the two is the way the setting is mostly realistic, with one fantastical element; in maybe more of a stretch, both books use a narrative device of... talking about something that wasn't "really" happening to make sense of something that was...? Like, in Paul, the main plot is woven through with fairy tale retellings that provide a sort of insight-by-metaphor into the titular Paul, and in Self-Portrait, the long-lost daughter copes with situations she doesn't want to be in by imagining what she'd be doing instead, in different universes. (For that matter, both books reminded me of other books: I found Paul reminiscent of Katya Kazbek's Little Foxes Took Up Matches, in the way that both use fairy/folk tales to frame a queer coming-of-age story, and Self-Portrait turned out to share a major plot point/concept with, of all things, Maggie Stiefvater's Call Down the Hawk.)

Read Trust by Hernan Diaz, a novel made up of four variations on the same story: a 1930s novel about a preternaturally successful financier and his wife; a half-finished memoir by the "real" financier, intended to refute the fictionalization of his life in the novel-within-a-novel; the late-in-life memoir of the ghostwriter behind the financier's memoir, the daughter of an Italian anarchist; and the diary the financier's wife kept in her last months. The financier's wife is the point of greatest difference between all four sections— she's painted as a tragic figure by the novelist and as a childlike saint by her husband; the ghostwriter grapples with this dissonance and fills the gaps with her own self-identification; and finally, her journal turns everything from the proceeding sections on its head.
troisoiseaux: (reading 10)
Read The Bandit Queens by Parini Shroff: "a young Indian woman finds the false rumors that she killed her husband surprisingly useful— until other women in the village start asking for her help getting rid of their own husbands." Very fun read! It's a dark comedy that touches on serious themes— abusive relationships, sexual assault, sexism, caste and religious prejudice— but frequently made me laugh out loud.

Read The Bookseller of Inverness by S.G. MacLean, a historical mystery/thriller set in the Scottish Highlands. A disillusioned veteran of the 1745 Jacobite rebellion turned curmudgeonly bookseller finds a murdered stranger inside his shop, with a white cockade tied to the knife that killed him, on the same day that his fugitive father— a veteran of '15 and '45, and a spy for King James— returns to Inverness, drawing him into a tangled web of old betrayals and new conspiracies.
troisoiseaux: (reading 9)
Read a couple of contemporary slice-of-life novels: Nevada by Imogen Binnie, about a trans woman who goes on a post-break-up road trip and befriends a small-town stoner who reminds her of her younger self, and in a now-annual re-read, The Sentence by Louise Erdrich, about an Ojibwe bookseller haunted by the ghost of a persistent former customer during the early months of the pandemic.

Read Thinning Blood by Leah Myers, a memoir about her identity as the last person in her family line eligible to be an enrolled member of the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe and the women she's descended from. Shuffles myth, history, family stories, and personal experience like a deck of cards and deals them out in little vignettes.

Read The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes by Suzanne Collins, a prequel to her Hunger Games trilogy; it was actually really good?? Or at least really compelling. It felt darker than the original books, not least because it's a dystopian novel whose POV character— a young Coriolanus Snow, future dictator and main villain of the Hunger Games books— has fully bought into the ideology of the dystopia he lives in; ... )

Read The Fabulist: The Lying, Hustling, Grifting, Stealing, and Very American Legend of George Santos by Mark Chiusano, which is what it says on the tin. I have a certain fascination with audacious public liars— like Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos infamy, or the bizarre spate of white academics pretending to be people of color a while back— so of course I've been following every bonkers twist of the George Santos saga over the past two-ish years.

I'm currently reading Yellowface by R.F. Kuang, which fits in rather neatly with the above; the concept is basically Jean Hanff Korelitz's The Plot (struggling writer steals a book idea/unfinished draft from a deceased student/frenemy and passes it off as their own work) with more satire about cultural appropriation and the publishing industry.
troisoiseaux: (reading 8)
Read The Sewing Girl's Tale: A Story of Crime and Consequences in Revolutionary America by John Wood Sweet, about the first publicized rape trial in American history, in New York City in 1793, when 17-year-old seamstress Lanah Sawyer pressed charges against the wealthy man who had sexually assaulted her. Three guesses for how this trial played out, and the first two don't count.

Read more... )

Read To Love and Be Wise by Josephine Tey— I actually guessed the twist before opening the book, because I made a connection between the plot summary, having once read that SPOILER REDACTED ) comes up in one of Tey's novels, and also, well, the fact that it was recommended to me; I ended up reading the last chapter first to confirm my theory. This would have been a fun read even if I had taken a more orthodox approach— in some ways, it feels like a successful execution of what Sayers was aiming for in The Five Red Herrings, as a mystery set in a village overrun by eccentric artists and hinging, in part, on an object that isn't there— but I'm actually glad I read it fully spoiled, which is another data point for my musings on when I like being "in the know" vs. letting a mystery unfold as intended: ... )
troisoiseaux: (reading 7)
Read The Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey, a 1951 mystery novel about a detective who delves into the 15th-century case of the princes in the tower while bed-bound with a broken leg and bored out of his mind. Super interesting book, possibly not for the reasons Tey intended. Her detective's conclusion ) is probably best taken with several shakers of salt, but overall, it's quite fascinating as a contemplation of how history gets written and taught and interpreted, and inadvertently meta as said contemplation is filtered through a very specific perspective ("reflect[ing] a dislike and distrust of emotional popular narratives concerning supposed historical injustices," per Wikipedia). It's also interesting, having finally read another Josephine Tey book besides Miss Pym Disposes, to compare the way that assumptions based on appearances play out in both books: ... )

Read Mr. Rowl by D.K. Broster, a 1924 historical romance set during the Napoleonic Wars. The plot is delightfully bananas, just an absolute roller coaster of one dramatic misunderstanding after another:

In which I basically just recount the entire plot of Mr. Rowl )
troisoiseaux: (reading 6)
Read The Looking Glass War by John le Carré, about a deeply incompetent intelligence agency— not the Circus, of le Carré's other novels (although it, and George Smiley, plays a role in this one) but the remains of a WWII-era military intelligence agency, the Department, long since stripped for its useable parts and desperate to keep up appearances— whose collective mid-life crisis has a body count when they recruit a long-retired operative for one last mission in East Germany.

Read The Last Kingdom by Bernard Cornwell, the first book in a sprawling historical fiction series about a Saxon-born, Viking-raised warrior in 9th century Britain. I enjoyed reading this but don't feel particularly inclined to continue the series.

Read Prophet by Sin Blaché and Helen Macdonald— I've seen people on DW enthusing over this book for months, and it completely lived up to the hype, especially since I somehow managed to go in entirely unspoiled! My impression of the plot, going in, was "manic Brit and stoic American investigate supernatural phenomena," which I think both is and is not an accurate summary; the authors have described it as "a mystery, a sci-fi adventure, a spy thriller, a queer romance, a military horror story, and satire about the weaponisation of nostalgia in our present cultural moment" and, yep, it is all of those things.

Read A Rome of One's Own: The Forgotten Women of the Roman Empire by Emma Southon, which had kind of a weak start— the first third or so basically just recounted stories from Livy and Ovid in a "gossipy podcaster" voice— but I'm glad I didn't give up, because it was worth the read once it got to the stories of Roman women that we know about through, e.g., archeological sources rather than Roman historians, like Pompeiian businesswoman Julia Felix or the woman known as Turia whose life story was recorded on a now-fragmented gravestone, or even through their own writings, like the personal correspondence between two military wives in Roman Britain, Sulpicia Lepidina and Claudia Severa, found among the Vindolanda tablets, and the graffiti left by Hadrian's court poet Julia Balbilla on the Colossi of Memnon.
troisoiseaux: (reading 5)
Read The Visionist by Rachel Urquhart, historical fiction set in a Shaker community in 1840s New England, told through the perspective of three characters: Polly, a teenage girl whose mother indentures her and her brother to the Shakers after she accidentally kills her abusive father; Charity, a girl raised in the Shaker community from infancy; and Simon, a man "of the World" investigating the fire that killed Polly's father. It's a heavy read, both in ways I'd expected going into this and ways I hadn't; I might not have picked it up if I'd known beforehand about a particular plot point, ) but it was an interesting book.

For those who don't know about the Shakers (and I had only the vaguest knowledge, going into this book): it was (technically, is, as there is apparently one remaining Shaker community) a Christian religious sect mainly active in the 19th century, in the northeastern U.S., which "practices a celibate and communal utopian lifestyle, pacifism, uniform charismatic worship, and their model of equality of the sexes" (x)— in which men and women were considered equal, but communities were strictly segregated by gender— and the belief that their founder, Mother Ann, was the second coming of Christ. Given the whole "celibacy" thing, children were adopted or indentured into the community and raised communally; Shakers were discouraged from recognizing their "flesh relations," even if family members joined the community together. (One of the creepier details in the book was a children's song to indoctrinate young Shakers against their birth families.) Urquhart paints a fairly nuanced picture, through Polly's and Charity's different POVs, although I get the sense that her personal stance is one of fascinated disapproval; she notes in her afterword that "[t]o sign on with the Shakers was to accept an often dreary, cultish existence, but for a certain type of person in a certain type of bind, it made sense."

Read more... )
troisoiseaux: (reading 3)
Read The Bull from the Sea by Mary Renault, sequel to The King Must Die in her duology about the Greek hero Theseus. It's hard to say which I liked more— the highlights, for me, were the Cretan bull-leaping arc in the first book (e.g., the Theseus and the Minotaur retelling) and the Theseus-and-Hippolyta arc in this one. Despite the questionable beginning of Theseus immediately going THE GODS MADE US FOR EACH OTHER, I MUST HAVE HER and then dueling with Hippolyta for his life vs. her freedom, they actually have one of the most well-adjusted relationships I've encountered in a Renault novel! This book also included the Theseus-and-Phaedra-and-Hippolytus story, which was interesting to compare to Jennifer Saint's recent retelling; I imagine there is a way to interpret that particular myth that doesn't involve demonizing either Theseus or Phaedra, but neither Renault nor Saint seem to have found it. (Saint's take is that Theseus Is The Worst; Renault's is that Phaedra Is The Worst, in a way that, next to Hippolyta, smacks of the inverse of Not Like Other Girls, but admittedly Theseus doesn't come out of it looking great, either.)

Read The Battle of the Labyrinth by Rick Riordan, book #4 of the Percy Jackson series— I'd picked it up because it was the one available on Libby, rather than for the Theseus-myth-adjacent title, but although it focuses on the Daedalus aspects of the myth, Theseus does have a brief, ghostly cameo. (Actually, this book is probably why I'd always assumed Theseus died young, and was surprised to find otherwise, in Renault's retelling: Riordan's ghostly Theseus is just a teenager.) Re-reading this for the first time since middle school, I was very amused to realize that Nico di Angelo was the original moody gay* (pre)teen** necromancer*** of my heart; I am apparently nothing if not consistent. I also got a laugh out of a joke about Blue Ribbon schools and standardized testing that I'm sure went over my head as a kid, when Percy and the gang encounter a sphynx that had updated her whole "answer a riddle to pass" deal to a 20-question pop quiz (via scantron, of course!)

* according to one of the later spin-off series, which I haven't read but was utterly delighted to hear about a few years back
** I think he's 11 or 12 in this book, although technically, he's been 11 since the 1940s
*** son of Hades
troisoiseaux: (reading 4)
Read Anno Dracula by Kim Newman, alt-historical fantasy of the "fun with public domain characters" variety, set in a world where Dracula won and successfully took over England, resulting in a society split between mortals ("warm") and vampires ("new-born"/"un-dead"). Arthur Godalming is a vampire! Jack Seward is Jack the Ripper! Oscar Wilde is there! Bram Stoker is not, having been disappeared as an enemy of Dracula's dictatorship (along with, among others, Sherlock Holmes, neatly resolving the issue of why he is not on the case)! This book was nuts, and I found it highly entertaining.

The "Jack Seward as Jack the Ripper" storyline turned out to be a good example of something I was musing about after reading The Square of Sevens, which is that I enjoy the use of dramatic irony that comes from giving the reader more information than the characters have, more than I enjoy narratives where the characters have more information than the reader and the reader is given clues from which I may or may not be able to figure out the big twist. Here, you find out in the first chapter that Seward is behind the Whitechapel murders that the two main characters— a vampire social worker and a human spy— spend the book trying to solve.

On a side note, if I had a nickel for every book where "Gilbert & Sullivan in a world where Dracula is real" is a thing, I'd have ten cents, but it's weird it happened twice. In this book, one random world-building detail involved reframing Ruddigore as political satire in a world where Lord Ruthven (of Polidori's The Vampyre/Marschner's Der Vampyr) is prime minister. The other example is Phyllis Ann Karr's The Vampire of the Savoy ("Can an idealistic young vampire succeed as Gilbert and Sullivan's comic lead in an alternate world where Dracula is a documentary?")— which, from the sample I read online, also features the vampire Clement Czarny (or Clement Black) who appears as the non-vampiric Squire Clement le Noir in Karr's Sir Mordred and the Green Knight.
troisoiseaux: (reading 2)
Read The Fraud by Zadie Smith, historical fiction based off of the life of 19th century English author William Harrison Ainsworth and the 1873-74 Tichborne claimant trials, but focused on figures at the corner of history's eye: Ainsworth's cousin and housekeeper, Eliza Touchet, and one of the witnesses who identified the Claimant as the presumed-to-be-deceased Roger Tichborne, Andrew Bogle, who grew up enslaved in Jamaica. It's a curious, kaleidoscopic book, told in mostly one- or two-page-long vignettes, bouncing between Eliza's past (mostly 1840s, iirc) and present (1870s) until it veers sharply into Bogle's self-narrated life story, and then back again.

Read Sir Mordred and the Green Knight, a new short story by Phyllis Ann Karr; it is less a direct "what if Mordred, instead of Gawain, took up the Green Knight's challenge?" AU than I had expected from the title, and in fact centers mostly on an original character of Karr's— an idealistic young squire— who, according to the afterword, appears to be an Arthurian AU of a character from Karr's steampunk alt-history works (?) who is, in his home canon, a vampire (??). However, it does involve Mordred coping badly with finding out he's prophesied to kill Arthur, which appealed to my personal interests.
Page generated Mar. 25th, 2024 04:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios