troisoiseaux: (reading 8)
Continued my nostalgic re-reads of formative 2000s YA with A Brief History of Montmaray by Michelle Cooper, a novel about the impoverished, eccentric royal family of a very small island - think Gibraltar, but legally independent, mostly abandoned, and on the other side of Spain? - in the years before WWII, in the form of the diary of 16-year-old princess Sophia FitzOsborne. (I only realized years after originally reading this how much it owes to Dodie Smith's I Capture The Castle, which I've still never actually read.) This holds up delightfully, although it feels almost embarrassingly self-indulgent, in terms of realizing how precisely it's calibrated to appeal to a certain type of teenage girl and how precisely I was part of that target audience, which might be best described as "former American Girl and Dear America girlies." (And, I suspect, Samantha girlies in particular?) Like, it's just sooo.... she's an orphan living in a crumbling castle (with secret tunnels, a slightly unhinged housekeeper, and possibly ghosts) on an isolated island! She feels herself the too-ordinary middle child among her more talented/charming/outrageous/etc. siblings and cousins, but she's our protagonist, of course she has hidden depths! Plot threads include Sophie's crush on slightly older family friend Simon,* whether to move to London to be Presented Into Society as her aunt insists,** and the looming specter of real-world 1930s geopolitics— the boiling-pot build-up to, you know, WWII - a reference to the fascist sympathies of the British upper class in one of Sophie's brother's letters here, a piece of news there - is chilling, but things get dramatic very quickly when two lost German "historians" (or so they claim) wash ashore.

Footnotes (100% spoilers) )
troisoiseaux: (reading 7)
Currently reading Days of the Dead by Barbara Hambly, one of her Benjamin January historical mysteries, usually set in 1830s New Orleans, although this one sees newlyweds January and Rose take a busman's honeymoon to Mexico to rescue their friend Hannibal Sefton, who has been accused of murder. Enjoying this! It's very Gothic: the mad patriarch ruling over his isolated hacienda with an iron fist, where pretty much everyone else is on their way to madness if not already there; the picturesque ruins in the form of Aztec pyramids; and of course, People Getting Real Weird With Religion. So far, this book's historical cameo has been General Santa Anna, who I did not connect with the sea shanty "Santiana" until a reference to his nickname as "Napoleon of the West"; I've also noticed that Hambly has an apparent running joke with herself of slipping in the names of minor characters from Les Mis (e.g., Combeferre's Livery in Die Upon A Kiss) and assumed the French chef named Guillenormand was one of those, although the spelling differs slightly— and as this Guillenormand is a "heretic Revolutionist" who fled France upon the Bourbons' return to power, I doubt Hugo's Gillenormand would acknowledge any relation.

I'm approximately three-quarters through Dune and things have gotten really weird. (Jessica + the Water of Life ritual????) Also, oddly, this audiobook keeps slipping back and forth between using a full cast of different voice actors for the different characters and having a single narrator Doing Voices for all the characters, which has a very odd effect when it changes from scene to scene and the main narrator has a completely different way of reading, e.g., Count Fenring's verbal tic than the other, specific voice actor does. It has also introduced more of a soundscape, including (in a move so cliche it was accidentally funny) ambiguously exotic flute music when Paul's Fremen love interest Zendaya Chani was introduced. So far my favorite chapter/scene has been when Frank Herbert used one character's death to be like "AND IN THIS ESSAY I WILL—" about ecology, via that guy's dying hallucinations of his dead father.
troisoiseaux: (reading 6)
Continued my nostalgic re-reads of 2000s middle-grade/YA novels with I'd Tell You I Love You But Then I'd Have To Kill You by Ally Carter, the first book in the Gallagher Girls series, set at an all-girls boarding school for TEEN SPIES. As you can imagine, this was my jam in middle school! However, my primary emotion on re-reading this book as an adult was second-hand embarrassment, since main character Cammie (a superspy nepo baby, whose mom is the headmistress of the Gallagher Academy for Exceptional Young Women and whose dad died tragically on a top-secret mission) mostly puts the lessons learned in her Covert Operations class - that one man's trash is another's treasure trove of the first guy's secrets, how to build and maintain a cover story, etc. - to practical, if ill-advised, use by... stalking some cute normie boy and then sneaking out to go on dates with him. (I know, I know, this is a YA novel, but COMPLETE waste of an elite spy education, if you ask me.) The climactic sequence where Cammie and friends take their CoveOps practical final - a heist! - was fun, though.
troisoiseaux: (reading 5)
Following a conversation with [personal profile] sovay about formative mermaid media, spent the evening re-reading The Tail of Emily Windsnap by Liz Kessler - a 2003 middle-grade novel about a girl who discovers she can turn into a mermaid - to see how it holds up as a recommendation for a young reader 20+ years (oof) later. Emily's mermaid adventures include but are not limited to befriending another tweenage mermaid, exploring a sunken ship, and discovering that her long-lost father is a merman and sneaking into the underwater prison (!) where he's been languishing for the past 12 years (!!) for breaking the law against fraternization with humans (!!!). (Also, that her mom's memory of their relationship was wiped (!!!!) and their family friend the creepy lighthouse keeper has been an agent for the anti-human-fraternization king of the merfolk the whole time. (!!!!!)) So, yeah, the plot is kind of bananas, but it's charming and, most importantly, the descriptions of how cool it would be to swim in the ocean as a mermaid and explore kelp forests and sunken ships, etc., are great. Verdict: it holds up! I don't think I'd noticed as a kid how many of the throwaway minor (human) characters had punny or otherwise nautical names like "Sandra Castle" and "Mrs. Brig"; I definitely had never realized that the author is British and therefore the book presumably takes place in England rather than, like, Florida (as I'd pictured as a kid) or Maine (as I imagined it this time).

Made some progress in the Dune audiobook over the weekend; I'm through Book One (of Three). Unfortunately, so far Book Two has mostly involved Paul being rude about his mom not being able to follow along with whatever Space Jesus logic-connections-as-revelation thing he has going on, which I'm finding less interesting than the Space Medici politics and backstabbing of the first third.
troisoiseaux: (colette)
I managed to swing a last-minute day trip to NYC to see Dead Outlaw yesterday after it was suddenly announced (last weekend) that the show was closing early (this weekend), making this the second time in six months I've caught one of the last performances of an unfairly short-lived folk-rock musical at the Longacre Theater that's more or less based off of a real event involving weird things happening to a corpse. (The other was Swept Away; seriously, is the Longacre cursed or something?!) (ETA: ...apparently yes??)

Dead Outlaw is based on the weirder-than-fiction true story of Elmer McCurdy, a train robber killed in a 1911 shootout whose preserved corpse ended up being displayed as part of various carnival sideshows and movie sets throughout the 1920s-40s, until eventually rediscovered in the funhouse of a California amusement park in the 1970s. (Yes, really.) The musical spends approximately equal time on McCurdy's life - a childhood unmoored by a family revelation, a teenage descent into hooliganism and attempt to restart out west, a near-engagement to a nice girl until he self-sabotages, a short and wildly unsuccessful career as an outlaw - and afterlife, which the musical fills with sort of one-song vignettes: the Oklahoma coroner and subsequent series of carnies who displayed McCurdy's body to make a quick buck; the Cherokee runner Andy Payne, who won the 1928 Trans-America Footrace at which McCurdy was displayed as part of the sideshow (only a tenuous connection, but such a cool story I see why they included it); the daughter of a movie director who purchased McCurdy as a film prop, who treats him as a sort of confidant; the 1970s Los Angeles County coroner with a star-studded "client" list.

This show slapped unbelievably hard, as the kids say. I loved the format! There was a live band on stage, and the band's frontman narrated McCurdy's life story (and posthumous adventures) while the action/narrative scenes played out around and occasionally on top of the main set piece, a sort of movable, patio-style stage where the band played; a friend who saw the show before I did described it as "feeling like you were watching a podcast." Some - most? - of the characters' songs are staged... diegetically, as it were, but sometimes they'd join the band "on stage"(-within-a-stage) and take over the frontman's microphone, such as Elmer McCurdy's rock-star-tantrum crash-out ("Killed A Man in Maine", which the narrator informed us afterwards is probably not even true), or more poignantly, as McCurdy's girlfriend's song ("A Stranger") shifts from the in-story action/conversation - identifying his body - to imagining the future they could have had together when she steps up to the microphone alongside the band. Other than Andrew Durand as Elmer McCurdy - whose athleticism in the first half of the show and ability to remain disconcertingly corpse-still in the second half were equally impressive - everyone in the cast played a bunch of different characters; even the narrator doubled as the outlaw who recruited McCurdy, thinking that he was an explosives expert. (He was not.) The music was actually not as consistently folk-rock as I had expected from the couple of songs I'd heard beforehand— particularly in the second half, with its rotating cast of one-off characters, the styles ranged from more typical Broadway numbers to barbershop quartet vibes (the carnival promoters who buy McCurdy's body off the first coroner, claiming to be his brothers) to nightclub-crooner jazz (the LA coroner). It was also SO clever and SO funny— the set-up and payoff of the humor was just brilliant. (In particular, utilizing the under-tapped comedic power of letting the audience stew for a bit: at one point, the narrator is like "and then Elmer was stuck in a closet for 20 years", followed by a solid minute or two of just... a completely dark stage except for a spotlight on Andrew Durand's motionless face, the audience stifling giggles like elementary schoolers told to behave at an assembly.) Very glad I saw this!!
troisoiseaux: (reading 4)
Read Finding Hester by Erin Edwards, about the making of the musical Operation Mincemeat, the group of fans whose crowdsourced research discovered that the MI5 secretary identified as Hester Leggett in Ben Macintyre's nonfiction account of Operation Mincemeat (and subsequent adaptations, including the musical) was actually named Hester Leggatt, and her life story that they uncovered, as well as biographical details about the other real-life figures featured in the musical. (In one particularly charming note: Ewen Montagu's descendants are fans of the musical, with one of them actually participating in the fan Discord that hosted the #FindingHester research efforts.) This is a love letter to online fandom at its best - finding people to collaborate with on a passion project - and to archival research, and a delightful tribute to one of history's proverbial forgotten well-behaved women. Is it still a spoiler if it's real life? )

Made some progress in Caroline Fraser's Murderland, which continues to be less focused on serial killers of the 1970s Pacific Northwest than I had expected; instead, the most recent chapter I finished touched on Dune (which I've also been neglecting), the Vietnam War, and Fraser's childhood daydreams about killing her abusive father.
troisoiseaux: (reading 3)
Read Stories I Tell Myself by Juan F. Thompson, his memoir about growing up as the son of writer Hunter S. Thompson. This was obviously interesting to read after seeing The Untitled Unauthorized Hunter S. Thompson Musical, but what really struck me is how Thompson wrote about his volatile childhood, and the relationship he built with his father over the years, through a lens of being both his father's son and a father himself.

Started reading Murderland: Crime and Bloodlust in the Time of Serial Killers by Caroline Fraser (whose biography of Laura Ingalls Wilder I read a few years back) and I'm curious to see where she's going with this, because there seem to be a couple of main threads emerging: her central argument appears to be that the reason the Pacific Northwest had so many serial killers in the 70s-80s was childhood exposure to lead poisoning and other toxins, but she's also writing a lot about the other ways the PNW can kill you - so far, poor bridge construction and earthquakes - and has started to weave in references to her own childhood on Mercer Island, near Seattle.

For a completely different vibe, I've been re-reading In Defiance of All Geometry and World Ain't Ready by idiopathicsmile, because I rewatched the Les Mis 25th Anniversary Concert and was immediately slammed with teenage fandom nostalgia. It occurs to me that the appeal of both idiopathicsmile's fics (+ the Les Mis fandom on Tumblr circa 2013-15 in general, really) and my favorite actual published YA in high school (Maggie Stiefvater's Raven Cycle) was the premise of having a close-knit group of friends who are deeply passionate about something (social justice! quest for a magical dead Welsh king!) and all a little bit in love with each other. I also discovered from a friend with an AO3 account that our mutual favorite author of canon-era Les Mis fic did not delete her fics, just made them private, so after a decade+ of lurking I finally signed up for an AO3 account, or rather for an invitation(?) to make one, which I will hopefully receive... some time next week?
troisoiseaux: (colette)
Emily Burns' new adaptation of Frankenstein at the Shakespeare Theatre Company is phenomenal— I've been struggling to explain it in a way that a. doesn't undersell how well it works and b. isn't just the Jenny Slate Drunk History meme, but trust me, it's so good. It's a reimagining of Mary Shelley's original plot— the first half takes the events of Victor's return to Geneva and re-centers it on his foster sister/fiancée(!) Elizabeth, and on Justine, the servant framed for the murder of Victor's younger brother; the second half departs from the book entirely, but has more than a little of Mary and Percy Shelley's history in its DNA— with a distinctly contemporary voice, but it weaves in Mary Shelley's original text in ways that carry new meanings: ... ) The dynamic between Victor and Elizabeth is messed up in a way that makes for delicious theater— Victor is the worst, in an "abusive boyfriend learns therapy words" way that, I swear, you could feel the audience (which, at least where I was sitting, skewed towards younger women) mentally screaming for Elizabeth to throw the entire man out; this play leans into the Gothic faux-cest vibes with flashbacks to the pair of them sniping like siblings— and the main theme is one of parents and children, explored through three different plot threads: obviously, that of Victor Frankenstein's refusal to take responsibility for the creature he created, which hangs over most of the play as an unspoken but omnipresent rebuke; the undercurrent of grief (mutual), resentment (Victor's), and guilt (Elizabeth's) over the fact that Victor's mother died because she'd nursed Elizabeth when she was ill; and spoilers! )

Also saw The Untitled Unauthorized Hunter S. Thompson Musical at the Signature Theater, having finally wised up to the fact that if a new musical is being produced in DC it's probably on its way to Broadway, so I might as well see it now. (Cheaper tickets! Potential bragging rights!) This is exactly what it says on the tin - a rock musical by Joe Iconis about writer Hunter S. Thompson, father of Gonzo journalism in the 1960s-70s - and certainly timely; to lean into the inevitable Hamilton comparisons, Hunter...'s Burr is Richard Nixon as a so-sleezy-it's-camp psychopomp haunting Thompson's final hours as he runs through his life story, and the parallels to, you know, that other guy are about as subtle as a bonk to the head. Very meta, overall: as it goes on, the other characters begin to confront Thompson over his version of events and demand to speak for themselves. There was a frequent use of puppets, including a peacock, a baby that could make a fight the man! fist and flip the bird, and a giant Nixon head. (Yes, in addition to the actor playing Nixon.) I enjoyed this a lot!! The only downside of seeing such a new show is that I've had random snippets of lyrics and melodies floating around in my head for days and there's no cast recording to listen to. (ETA: There is an official trailer, though!)

ETA #2: found some individual songs online )
troisoiseaux: (reading 2)
Read Real Ones by Katherena Vermette, discovered via [personal profile] sabotabby: a novel about about two adult sisters, who are Michif/Métis on their dad's side (this is important), grappling with the public exposure of their estranged mother's false claims of Indigenous ancestry, which she's used to build a career as an artist. I feel like most of the novels I've read tackling race-faking for profit/clout/??? in academia/the arts are biting satires - R.F. Kuang's Yellowface, Elaine Hsieh Chou's Disorientation - and even Louise Erdrich's The Sentence uses supernatural elements to express the violence of white people appropriating Indigenous identity; this one feels... subtler, maybe? It's very much grounded in the family drama of two sisters being betrayed and disappointed yet again by a self-absorbed mother who's betrayed and disappointed them over and over for as long as they can remember, this time playing out with a Greek chorus of op-eds and Twitter takes on a scandal now so weirdly familiar that Vermette tends to reference them obliquely rather than in detail. Really good; I especially liked how distinct the two sisters' voices were, as alternating POV characters.

Read With a Bare Bodkin by Cyril Hare, which fell short of Hare's Tragedy at Law, imo, but honestly, what wouldn't? This one had some fun concepts— set against the backdrop of a minor government agency housed in some sprawling pile for the duration of WWII, the plot kicks off with a conversation about how one of the civil servants is a mystery novelist on the side and everyone going "oooh wouldn't this office be a great setting for a murder mystery?", so it's got quite a crossover of tropes— and also the distinction of being one of the few mysteries where the author pulls a "clearly signaling something as A Clue by having the main character realize that some detail is Significant" and I actually immediately twigged to the discrepancy being hinted at and remembered where to cross-reference the detail earlier in the book, although, to be fair, this was not exactly subtly dropped, either in context or by the author to the reader.
troisoiseaux: (reading 1)
Read Sleeping Murder by Agatha Christie and - ironically, for a book about deja vu - could not figure out whether or not I'd read this one before. (Confusing things further was that it turns out to be one of the at least three Christie novels to feature an apparently senile elderly woman in a nursing home who talks about a child buried behind a fireplace! Fascinating implications for my Agatha Christie Extended Universe theory, because either Marple, Poirot, and Tommy and Tuppence do in fact all exist in the same universe and have encountered the same woman, or they don't, but this specific scenario is a constant across multiple universes; equally fascinating on a Doylist level, because— what???) ANYWAY. This was a fun one: the spoiler-free version is that a young couple reconstructs a twenty-year-old murder that hits close to home, literally. Spoilers )
troisoiseaux: (reading 11)
Read Country by Michael Hughes, a more or less beat-by-beat retelling of the Iliad set in Northern Ireland during the Troubles— the Greeks are IRA, the Trojans are British soldiers; Helen (Nellie) was turned as an informant for the British and finagled herself a new life in London out of it, under the not entirely untrue story that she'd run off with a British soldier; the gods are politicians from London and Dublin making back-channel deals and local ones who can be tapped for a favor. God, this was brilliant. This is what retellings are for: a cultural translation with something interesting to say about both the source material and the new context; the oh, that's clever of recognizing how stuff has been "translated", especially when it takes a chapter or two for the significance of a certain detail to click. (I did have the Wikipedia synopsis of the Iliad open for reference the entire time.)

Just started listening to Frank Herbert's Dune as a full-cast audiobook, which I'm coming to pretty much blind – I haven't seen the movies, and to the extent I have learned anything through cultural osmosis, it's that Paul is Space Jesus and it's a metaphor for the fight over oil in the Middle East...? – but liking it so far. Kind of wild to read for the first time in 2025, among all the articles about everyone outsourcing their brains to ChatGPT: "Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free, but that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them." Like, oh, this is the Torment Nexus from sci-fi classic Don't Build the Torment Nexus.
troisoiseaux: (reading 10)
Read Why We Broke Up by Daniel Handler, a 2011 YA novel I'd originally read in high school but that I a. had completely forgotten about and b. don't?? think?? I'd ever realized was by the Daniel Handler, better known for his writing as Lemony Snicket, until recently stumbling across a copy in a used bookstore. (I was not re-read-curious enough to buy the second-hand copy, but I found it on Libby.) The tl;dr plot is that a teenage girl unravels the threads of a short-lived relationship through the objects she'd collected during it: bottle caps, ticket stubs, etc. (Illustrated, which is a fun touch.) I can see what appealed to teenage!me - not a big reader of YA even when I was the target audience - about this book, which is that it's sort of endearingly pretentious: main character Minerva "Min" Green is obsessed with old and/or foreign films, and her narration is full of references to (fictional) movies and actors; the novel opens at her best friend's "bitter sixteen" party; the narrative voice has a very circa-2010s Tumblr Poetry vibe, addressed to "you", i.e., the boy Min is breaking up with. On the other hand, it is a teenage romance novel from 2011, which reminded me why I was, and am, not particularly into romance novels and also that 2011 was actually quite a while ago. (It also occurred to me, this time, that this can't possibly be set in 2011: there is exactly one reference to Min having a cell phone, but no one texts, she and her boyfriend have late-night calls over their landline home phones, and the internet does not appear to exist.)

On reflection, I wonder whether this was an intentional exercise in writing from the point of view of a character who would be the manic pixie dream girl love interest in a different story? Her love interest is a fondly baffled jock who says things like "I don't know any girls like you" and doesn't really get why it's important to her that the old woman they see at the cinema is maybe, possibly the actress in the film they just saw but goes along with the idea of throwing her (the actress) an eighty-ninth birthday party. Spoiler alert? ) There's a whole bit at the end about how she's not actually arty or interesting, she's just herself, a flawed and normal person.

In a YA-adjacent but wildly different read, I finally got around to Unmask Alice: LSD, Satanic Panic, and the Imposter Behind the World's Most Notorious Diaries by Rick Emerson— I haven't actually read Go Ask Alice,* the supposedly true diary of a teenage drug addict that was actually written by a Mormon woman lying about being a psychologist, but the podcast You're Wrong About did a three-part episode on it in ...2022, apparently??, which is what originally brought Emerson's book to my attention, and then last week I listened to the more recent You're Wrong About/American Hysteria crossover episodes on literary hoaxes and was like, oh, right, I'd meant to read that. ANYWAY. This book is actually about both Go Ask Alice and Beatrice Sparks' 1979 follow-up, Jay's Journal— in which Sparks did take the actual diary of a 16-year-old who died by suicide, handed over to Sparks by his grieving mother, and then rewrote it to be about ~the occult~ (in the worst of both worlds, lifting just enough of Alden Barrett's actual diary to make him and his family, friends, hometown, etc., clearly identifiable among the 90% insane fabrications)— and its role in the Satanic Panic of the '80s. Which is a topic with absolutely no contemporary relevance, obviously. By the end, Emerson is so clearly sick of wading through Sparks' nonsense that you get lines like "Beatrice Sparks was no more a psychologist than she was a Sasquatch, and even a lazy editor could have unraveled the lies with a single phone call."

* I have the memory of coming across it in middle school, reading the first couple of pages where she's just whining about boys and school, and deciding I had no interest in this. So, technically, I didn't finish Go Ask Alice because it was too boring.
troisoiseaux: (reading 9)
I recently got around to listening to the cast album for Operation Mincemeat, a new-ish musical about the 1943 British deception operation to disguise the planned Allied invasion of Sicily by planting false documents on a corpse, which I can only describe as "what if Team Starkid wrote a British version of Hamilton?" (Which I don't mean in a bad way! It's not going into my Spotify rotation, but I'd like to see it at some point during its Broadway run.) Obviously, after that, I had to read Ben Macintyre's nonfiction account Operation Mincemeat: How a Dead Man and a Bizarre Plan Fooled the Nazis and Assured an Allied Victory— it's a doozy of a spy story, stranger than fiction at every turn, from the sheer bonkers Rube Goldberg Trojan Horse of the whole idea to the farcical period where German spies in Spain were trying to get their hands on the documents and the British were pretending like it was of utmost important that they didn't, while also trying to make sure that they did - since that was, you know, the entire point - to the fact that operation mastermind Ewen Montagu's own brother was a Russian spy. (Which explains a subplot of the musical I couldn't quite piece together from the cast album.) I'd actually first encountered this particular bit of spy history during my middle school spy phase, and I remember being enchanted by how they'd conjured up this whole fictional persona down to the stuff in his pockets; it occurred to me this time that they'd essentially reverse-engineered a mystery, with puzzle pieces laid out to be pieced together into the intended misinformation: one of the carefully drafted letters sent by the doomed courier was included solely for a passing reference to sardines as A Clue that the second choice for the planned invasion discussed in the other letters was Sardinia (and definitely not Sicily). It is completely wild that this actually worked.

Anyway! While the plot and characters of the musical Operation Mincemeat appear to be a particularly tongue-in-cheek fictionalization of the actual events and people involved, I genuinely got a little choked up to discover that one of the lines from its song Dear Bill - And why did we meet in the middle of a war? / What a silly thing for anyone to do - is a line from an actual letter the actual Hester Leggett (ETA: actually Hester Leggatt) wrote to "Bill" from his fiancée "Pam."
troisoiseaux: (reading 8)
Read The Fact Checker by Austin Kelley, about a fact-checker at a magazine that is clearly the New Yorker (although, in retrospect, I don't think it's ever actually name-dropped?) in early 2000s NYC, who plays detective when an attractively eccentric young woman he meets as a source disappears shortly after making vague comments about something "nefarious" going on at the farmer's market where she works. It reminded me a bit of Dwyer Murphy's An Honest Living, but more picaresque than neo-noir. I enjoyed the narrative voice, with its scattered references of a brain full of trivia - particularly about 19th century American communal societies like the Shakers, Oneida, and Amos Bronson Alcott's Fruitlands - and turns of phrase like: "There was a long theremin solo, which sounded slightly like a little girl soprano and slightly like the inside of a lemon."

Two... warnings, I guess? Major spoiler, but I knew it going in because of another review. ) Second, there is one wildly unexpected, deeply weird scene involving animal death. )
troisoiseaux: (reading 7)
Finished Paris In Ruins: Love, War and the Birth of Impressionism by Sebastian Smee— [personal profile] osprey_archer beat me to writing a review; I co-sign all points, although I found that Smee's descriptions of paintings made up for the relative lack of actual art reproductions. Followed with Little Dancer Aged Fourteen: The True Story Behind Degas's Masterpiece by Camille Laurens, a slim, sprawling, personal meditation on the famous sculpture and its model, Marie van Goethem, that touches on everything from the pseudoscience of physiognomy* to Marilyn Monroe** to the plight of modern-day refugees and child laborers to the author's great-grandmother and childhood dreams of ballet. Fascinating book to read immediately after Smee's— at one point, Laurens mentions that Degas preferred the label "Intransigent" to "Impressionist" without mentioning the political context of the term,*** which Smee delved into; it's hard to square Laurens' description of Degas who "seemed to harbor an intellectual distrust towards women that closely bordered on contempt" with Degas who pitched a fit over the best way to display Berthe Morisot's drawings at a retrospective of her art that he, Renoir, and Monet organized after her death. (People! They're complicated!) I also found my reading experience overlaid with the palimpsest of a childhood picture book, Degas and the Little Dancer by Laurence Anholt, which made for a wild contrast.

Read more... )
troisoiseaux: (Default)
FINALLY saw Maybe Happy Ending, which is as good as everyone has said and definitely deserves all of its Tony noms! It's charming and funny - very Pixar, rom-com vibes - and just melancholy/bittersweet enough to stop short of being twee.

In a futuristic Seoul, Oliver (Darren Criss) is an early-generation Helperbot whose beloved owner, James, is definitely going to pick him up from the home for retired Helperbots any day now; Claire (Helen J. Shen) is a comparatively newer model but, as the iPhone to Oliver's Nokia, model-wise, is suffering the effects of planned obsolescence more quickly. After Claire shakes up Oliver's twelve-year-strong routine of puttering around his room waiting for James and talking to his plant, they decide to sneak out and road trip to Jeju Island, so Oliver can reunite with James and Claire can see the world's last remaining fireflies. On the way, Claire makes Oliver promise that, even though they're pretending to be a human couple, they won't fall in love; Oliver is like, "we're robots! we can't fall in love!" If you have consumed any media ever, you can see where this is going.

I loved the physicality of Criss' performance; he moves like a Disney animatronic come to life, emphasizing the difference between Oliver as a Model 3 and Claire as a more lifelike Model 5. (3 vs. 5 is a whole thing, plot-wise, but also sets up the joke that got the biggest laugh: when they stop at what turns out to be a "love motel" to recharge (literally), pretending with varying degrees of success to be A Normal Human Couple, they run into another guest who makes a comment along the lines of "where did you find a 10 like her?", to which Oliver cheerfully chirps, "actually, she's a 5!") Shen is also fantastic; she and Criss play well off each other, and their voices are gorgeous together.

Besides Criss and Shen - and not counting the understudies/stand-bys, or the two additional actors appear as Claire's former owners in pre-recorded flashbacks, or the orchestra - the rest of the cast consists of one actor who plays Oliver's favorite jazz singer, appearing whenever Oliver plays his albums (this musical has diegetic and non-diegetic numbers!) and another who plays James, James' son, and all of the bit parts. (There's a tongue-in-cheek nod to this in the running joke that Oliver thinks all humans look alike.) And also Oliver's plant HwaBoon, who's the third lead, really, and gets its own bio in the playbill.

The set and effects were fantastic; watch this trailer, which also shows what I mean about Criss' physicality. The moving shadow-box set pieces and neon reminded me a bit of National Theatre's Angels in America, actually, although the set pieces were lush with detail where AIA was minimalist. The scene with the fireflies was absolutely breathtaking: up until that point, the stage was very segmented in terms of what you could see, but after the first firefly appears as a little light on the tip of a conductor's baton wielded by the aforementioned jazz singer, they "open up" a full view of the stage to reveal a forest grove of full of "fireflies" and the orchestra performing on stage, and there were little blinking firefly lights along the balcony railings, etc., as well as the stage!!

Anyway! 10/10, definitely worth taking a 6 am train to NYC, I hope this wins all the Tonys.
troisoiseaux: (reading 6)
Currently reading Paris in Ruins: Love, War and the Birth of Impressionism by Sebastian Smee, which I'd acquired after seeing the Paris 1874: the Impressionist Moment exhibit at the National Gallery of Art in December and then just... never actually picked up. Glad I finally did! So far (about halfway through) it's mostly about the 1870-71 Prussian siege of Paris, although it's not not about the Impressionist art movement, as it centers the experiences of Édouard Manet, Berthe Morisot, and other artists. It's the type of narrative non-fiction that reads like a novel, which irks me slightly because there are some details, or feelings that he ascribes to the historical figures he's writing about, that have me like okay, but how do we KNOW this? - not even in a "I'm doubting this account" way! I just want to know if someone had written it in a letter or what! - but also makes for a compelling read, so I don't mind too much.

I don't actually know a lot about the Franco-Prussian war or the Paris Commune, so it's been interesting to learn more about that period. In particular, the use of hot air balloons during the siege of Paris— during my 2023 re-read of Les Mis, I was struck by a reference to hot air balloons in Enjolras' "the 19th century was great, but the 20th century will be happy" speech - "we are on the point of taking the griffin, we already have him, and he is called the balloon" - and this book has added an interesting twist to that. For one thing, apparently Victor Hugo was super interested in hot air balloons! Also, although Les Mis was written about a decade before Nadar's balloons played a vital role in getting letters (and politician Léon Gambetta) out of Paris during the siege, it sort of lends a new significance to the quote, while at the time I'd been like— hot air balloons? How adorably quaint! Just over a century after Hugo wrote this speech, humanity landed on the moon! So, yeah, my apologies to the humble balloon.
troisoiseaux: (reading 5)
Read Extra Salty by Frederick Blichert, a novella-length retrospective on cinematic masterpiece Jennifer's Body, part of a series of pop culture commentaries published as cute little pamphlet-sized books by ECW Press. Thoughtful recap of the movie's themes and the horror tropes it embraces and subverts, how the studio's mismarketing (and general societal misogyny) contributed to it being critically panned on its release in 2009, and its afterlife as a cult classic and then as a movie for the #MeToo moment that came out a decade too early to be appreciated.

Followed this up with Right, Down + Circle by Cole Nowicki, a love letter to Tony Hawk's Pro Skater from the same Pop Classics series. More personal than Blichert's, it's as much a memoir about what skateboarding, video games, and this particular video game about skateboarding have meant to the author as it is the story of how Pro Skater came to be and its pop culture impact. (This was actually my favorite of the two, although - or maybe because? - I was less familiar with Pro Skater as a piece of media.)

Some poems

Apr. 24th, 2025 11:12 pm
troisoiseaux: (fumi yanagimoto)
Earl
by Louis Jenkins [x]

In Sitka, because they are fond of them,
People have named the seals. Every seal
is named Earl because they are killed one
after another by the orca, the killer
whale; seal bodies tossed left and right
into the air. “At least he didn’t get
Earl,” someone says. And sure enough,
after a time, that same friendly,
bewhiskered face bobs to the surface.
It’s Earl again. Well, how else are you
to live except by denial, by some
palatable fiction, some little song to
sing while the inevitable, the black and
white blindsiding fact, comes hurtling
toward you out of the deep?

...

Lies About Sea Creatures
by Ada Limón [x]

I lied about the whales. Fantastical blue
water-dwellers, big, slow moaners of the coastal.
I never saw them. Not once that whole frozen year.
Sure, I saw the raw white gannets hit the waves
so hard it could have been a showy blow hole.
But I knew it wasn’t. Sometimes, you just want
something so hard, you have to lie about it,
so you can hold it in your mouth for a minute,
how real hunger has a real taste. Someone once
told me, gannets, those voracious sea birds
of the North Atlantic chill, go blind from the height
and speed of their dives. But that, too, is a lie.
Gannets never go blind and they certainly never die.

...

Scientific Method
by James Tadd Adcox [x]

Picture the ocean. No.
Picture the entire thing,
all at once.
You are not doing it.
It’s okay.
One day something terrible will happen,
and I will not be prepared.
troisoiseaux: (reading 4)
Read A Gallery of Rogues by Beth Lincoln, sequel to The Swifts: A Dictionary of Scoundrels, collectively a rollicking middle-grade series about young Shenanigan Swift and her sprawling extended family of nominatively-determined eccentrics— and, in this one, the Swifts' estranged French relatives, the Martinets. And a gang of theatrical art thieves! And an Interpol agent who is the long-standing ~nemesis~ of Shenanigan's uncle Maelstrom! Once again, this book feels like was written specifically to appeal to my 10-year-old self - it somehow reminds me of a whole bunch of memorable MG books circa the mid-2000s, including The Mysterious Benedict Society, Lemony Snicket, The Willoughbys (by Lois Lowry, apparently??), and Roxie and the Hooligans, with the added bonus of being casually, joyfully LGBT-affirming and diverse - but I don't actually begrudge it for arriving two decades late.

Read The Novices of Lerna by Ángel Bonomini (translated from Spanish by Jordan Landsman), a collection of short stories I picked up after hearing about the titular novella, in which a young man is offered a secretive academic fellowship alongside - it turns out - his twenty-three doppelgängers. I'd actually gotten my wires slightly crossed and assumed that this book was only the titular novella - which I had also assumed was, like, an actual novel? - so the short stories were a surprise, but they were great: lyrical, atmospheric, and strange, with a tendency to end on an abrupt, unsettling note that rattled around my head for a while afterwards.
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 08:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios