Recent reading
Feb. 5th, 2022 08:15 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Finished A Tale of Two Cities, which I was relieved to discover I still love— I'd spent so long considering it my favorite Dickens novel that it was genuinely disorienting to try to re-read it last summer and feel absolutely nothing. I'm sure someone, somewhere, has written a paper on the depiction of now-recognized mental health conditions in A Tale of Two Cities - Doctor Manette's PTSD, Sydney Carton's depression - which I'd be interested to read. I was also struck by the anonymity (?) of Dickens' depiction of the French Revolution, as compared to, say, Baroness Emma Orczy's Scarlet Pimpernel books or Victor Hugo's Ninety-Three, which include Robespierre et al. in at least cameo roles— the only actual historical figure he references (besides the "king with a large jaw and queen with a fair face") is the executioner Sanson. In the tragedy of its closing scene I'd forgotten how absolutely bananas the last act is. Sydney Carton is one of my all-time favorite fictional characters; probably even in my top five.
Read To the Chapel Perilous by Naomi Mitchison, which is SOOOOO good. Arthurian legend retold through the charmingly anachronistic lens of two reporters at rival papers— Merlin's Camelot Chronicle ("intimately connected with the Court and scarcely less so with the Church") and the pro-Orkney Northern Pict, run by (I confess, I snickered every time I read the name) Lord Horny (Satan, possibly??). This review by
skygiants has better commentary on the Arthurian-retelling aspect than I am able to give, but I can say that my favorite knight-centric chapter was the one about Sir Bors, in the same way that when I read the Odyssey I was charmed by how normal Menelaus and Helen were.
I really enjoyed Lienors (reporter for the Chronicle) and Dalyn (for the Pict), both individually and together! Their dynamic reminded me of the line from Good Omens about how field agents often found they had more in common with their opposite numbers than their minders back at headquarters. Mitchison's depiction of a partisan press was utterly unsurprising to read in 2022; what is surprising is that no one seems to have written an op-ed about revisiting To the Chapel Perilous in these days of "alternative facts."
I've been dipping in and out of Stalin's Daughter: The Extraordinary and Tumultuous Life of Svetlana Alliluyeva, by Rosemary Sullivan, for a couple of months now— it's not that long, or particularly difficult, but I've found it taken best in small doses, because hoo boy did she go through it. I just got to the point where Svetlana, who defected to the U.S. in the 1960s, joined Frank Lloyd Wright's widow's cult, which is not a sentence I could have predicted writing.
Read To the Chapel Perilous by Naomi Mitchison, which is SOOOOO good. Arthurian legend retold through the charmingly anachronistic lens of two reporters at rival papers— Merlin's Camelot Chronicle ("intimately connected with the Court and scarcely less so with the Church") and the pro-Orkney Northern Pict, run by (I confess, I snickered every time I read the name) Lord Horny (Satan, possibly??). This review by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I really enjoyed Lienors (reporter for the Chronicle) and Dalyn (for the Pict), both individually and together! Their dynamic reminded me of the line from Good Omens about how field agents often found they had more in common with their opposite numbers than their minders back at headquarters. Mitchison's depiction of a partisan press was utterly unsurprising to read in 2022; what is surprising is that no one seems to have written an op-ed about revisiting To the Chapel Perilous in these days of "alternative facts."
I've been dipping in and out of Stalin's Daughter: The Extraordinary and Tumultuous Life of Svetlana Alliluyeva, by Rosemary Sullivan, for a couple of months now— it's not that long, or particularly difficult, but I've found it taken best in small doses, because hoo boy did she go through it. I just got to the point where Svetlana, who defected to the U.S. in the 1960s, joined Frank Lloyd Wright's widow's cult, which is not a sentence I could have predicted writing.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 01:31 pm (UTC)I knew that Svetlana's life was A Lot but I had NOT realized that she ended up joining Frank Lloyd Wright's widow's cult (I also did not realize that Frank Lloyd Wright's widow had a cult! Wright himself yes; the widow, no) so perhaps I need to read that book too.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 01:50 pm (UTC)+1
My library has her book Travel Light, which has been described to me as "a feminist response to Tolkien's Bilbo," so I'm planning to read that next.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 05:07 pm (UTC)I love Mitchison and have read a lot of her books, and this one is the sole book of hers that I didn't even finish! I felt like it was making allusions all the time that I didn't get--not the Arthurian ones, but the newspaper ones. Anyway, do read more Mitchison. : )
no subject
Date: 2022-02-08 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-08 08:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 01:55 pm (UTC)I did not know that Frank Lloyd Wright had a cult, either! (His widow's cult was FLW's cult, I think, she just took it over after he died?) I also did not know that Frank Lloyd Wright had a mistress who was murdered in a way straight out of a horror film, so I've been learning a bizarre amount of stuff about Frank Lloyd Wright from, again, this biography of the daughter of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. The "six degrees of Kevin Bacon" of this is bananas.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 02:06 pm (UTC)I do also regularly mix up Frank Lloyd Wright and Andrew Lloyd Webber, however, so my knowledge of FLW is minimal, shall we say, at best. For years I did genuinely think that this one very busy person was a successful architect and playwright, because I’d managed to miss the generational difference!
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 02:19 pm (UTC)So, from what I've learned from this book/recent googling, Frank Lloyd Wright (and, after his death, his widow) ran a "Taliesin Fellowship" out of Wisconsin and Arizona (everyone relocated between the two annually) which was ostensibly an architectural school but really more of a commune with super culty vibes, especially when his widow took over, because she was into some weird mysticism stuff.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-08 06:26 pm (UTC)I look forward to someone well versed in both of these people writing that essay!
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 06:06 pm (UTC)Someone wrote AN OPERA about it which kind of squicks me a little bit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shining_Brow
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 08:14 pm (UTC)I guess you can't say that ninety years later is too soon for opera, especially when I don't feel the same way about John Adams' Nixon in China (1987) or Doctor Atomic (2005), but I understand why you feel weird about it. (Any discussion of the opera of John Adams and too soon must take into account The Death of Klinghoffer (1991), where aside from the conversation about the success of its portrayal of Israel/Palestine, six years later when the family is still devastated seems rather too soon to rip from the headlines and not change the names at all.)
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 02:03 pm (UTC)I've been wanting to read this book since you posted about it a few years ago, and I'm so glad I finally got the chance to! Thank you so much for the recommendation!!
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 07:41 pm (UTC)To The Chapel Perilous sounds amazing and weird in a brilliant way—I think my library has a copy, I must bump it up the list of Naomi Mitchison novels to get to next.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 10:16 pm (UTC)It may just have earned its #1 spot back, although that feels slightly unfair to Great Expectations, which is significantly more re-readable.
I hope you get the chance to read To the Chapel Perilous! It's great, 10/10 would recommend.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 08:02 pm (UTC)That was the conclusion of one of the first memes I ever did on LJ, seventeen years ago.
Mitchison's depiction of a partisan press was utterly unsurprising to read in 2022; what is surprising is that no one seems to have written an op-ed about revisiting To the Chapel Perilous in these days of "alternative facts".
Write and pitch it to Uncanny or Strange Horizons! Worth it!
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 10:26 pm (UTC)Off the top of my head and in no particular order, I would say my top five are Pierre Bezukhov (War and Peace), Jo March (Little Women), Stephen Maturin (Patrick O'Brian's Aubrey-Maturin books), Sydney Carton, and Hamlet. (This feels like an extremely psychologically revealing list.) Runners-up include Athos (The Three Musketeers) - in terms of quantity as much as quality; I've never seen an adaption where I didn't fall in love with Athos immediately - and T.H. White's Lancelot, as much for White's character notes as his actual depiction in The Once & Future King. I will almost certainly think of seven more as soon as I press "post."
Write and pitch it to Uncanny or Strange Horizons! Worth it!
Oh, goodness, I don't think I know enough about journalism, or history, or the history of journalism, or Naomi Mitchison to do the topic justice.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-05 10:49 pm (UTC)That speaks well for the various adaptations. (The first version I ever encountered of The Three Musketeers was the 1948 MGM in Technicolor, so Athos always looks to me like Van Heflin, actually. It is almost certainly where I first saw him.)
I will almost certainly think of seven more as soon as I press "post."
These are the workings of the human brain.
Oh, goodness, I don't think I know enough about journalism, or history, or the history of journalism, or Naomi Mitchison to do the topic justice.
I don't know that you need to. You're talking about writing about an experience. You just need to have had the experience and be able to articulate it! If you need to contextualize with research, it's not the bulk of the article.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-06 12:17 am (UTC)I have to confess, my favorite adaption is the gleefully ridiculous 2011 movie, with such very much not book-accurate elements as dueling airships and a Mission: Impossible-style heist sequence for Milady's theft of the queen's jewels.
You just need to have had the experience and be able to articulate it!
HmmmmMMMMM.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-08 03:22 am (UTC)